Topic: [APPROVED] Minecraft implication BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #571 is active.

create implication ghast_(minecraft) (140) -> minecraft (7622)
create implication slime_(minecraft) (88) -> minecraft (7622)
create implication spider_(minecraft) (64) -> minecraft (7622)
create implication skeleton_(minecraft) (51) -> minecraft (7622)
create implication blaze_(minecraft) (29) -> minecraft (7622)
create implication the_nether_(minecraft) (104) -> minecraft (7622)
create implication petra_(minecraft) (3) -> minecraft (7622)
create implication jesse_(minecraft) (2) -> minecraft (7622)
create implication wolf_(minecraft) (410) -> minecraft (7622)
create implication alex_(minecraft) (153) -> minecraft (7622)
create implication villager_(minecraft) (41) -> minecraft (7622)
create implication bee_(minecraft) (220) -> minecraft (7622)
create implication ravager_(minecraft) (12) -> minecraft (7622)
create implication vindicator_(minecraft) (0) -> minecraft (7622)
create implication fox_(minecraft) (335) -> minecraft (7622)
create implication warden_(minecraft) (219) -> minecraft (7622)

Reason:

EDIT: The bulk update request #571 (forum #302735) has been approved by @Millcore.

Updated by auto moderator

furrin_gok said:
Ghast and the_nether shouldn't have a suffix.

I was just creating a BUR for the tags that already existed, but I agree with gattonero2001's links, they're both ambiguous even if nothing else has used those names yet. Especially ghast.

Original page: https://e621.net/forum_topics/28331?page=1