Topic: [APPROVED] Andromorph and Gynomorph gender interaction BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #284 is active.

create alias am/f (0) -> andromorph/female (555)
create alias f/am (0) -> andromorph/female (555)
create alias am/fm (0) -> andromorph/female (555)
create alias fm/am (0) -> andromorph/female (555)
create alias andromorph_on_female (0) -> andromorph/female (555)
create alias female_on_andromorph (0) -> andromorph/female (555)
create alias m/am (0) -> andromorph/male (10519)
create alias am/m (0) -> andromorph/male (10519)
create alias andromorph_on_male (0) -> andromorph/male (10519)
create alias male_on_andromorph (0) -> andromorph/male (10519)
create alias am/ag (0) -> andromorph/ambiguous (256)
create alias ag/am (0) -> andromorph/ambiguous (256)
create alias am/? (0) -> andromorph/ambiguous (256)
create alias ?/am (0) -> andromorph/ambiguous (256)
create alias andromorph_on_ambiguous (0) -> andromorph/ambiguous (256)
create alias ambiguous_on_andromorph (0) -> andromorph/ambiguous (256)
create alias am/am (0) -> andromorph/andromorph (343)
create alias am/gm (0) -> gynomorph/andromorph (0)
create alias gm/am (0) -> gynomorph/andromorph (0)
create alias gynomorph_on_andromorph (0) -> gynomorph/andromorph (0)
create alias andromorph_on_gynomorph (0) -> gynomorph/andromorph (0)
create alias am/h (0) -> herm/andromorph (3)
create alias h/am (0) -> herm/andromorph (3)
create alias andromorph_on_herm (0) -> herm/andromorph (3)
create alias herm_on_andromorph (0) -> herm/andromorph (3)
create alias am/mh (0) -> maleherm/andromorph (32)
create alias mh/am (0) -> maleherm/andromorph (32)
create alias andromorph_on_maleherm (0) -> maleherm/andromorph (32)
create alias maleherm_on_andromorph (0) -> maleherm/andromorph (32)
create alias gm/f (0) -> gynomorph/female (39625)
create alias f/gm (0) -> gynomorph/female (39625)
create alias gm/fm (0) -> gynomorph/female (39625)
create alias fm/gm (0) -> gynomorph/female (39625)
create alias gynomorph_on_female (0) -> gynomorph/female (39625)
create alias female_on_gynomorph (0) -> gynomorph/female (39625)
create alias m/gm (0) -> gynomorph/male (26429)
create alias gm/m (0) -> gynomorph/male (26429)
create alias gynomorph_on_male (0) -> gynomorph/male (26429)
create alias male_on_gynomorph (0) -> gynomorph/male (26429)
create alias gm/ag (0) -> gynomorph/ambiguous (1754)
create alias ag/gm (0) -> gynomorph/ambiguous (1754)
create alias gm/? (0) -> gynomorph/ambiguous (1754)
create alias ?/gm (0) -> gynomorph/ambiguous (1754)
create alias gynomorph_on_ambiguous (0) -> gynomorph/ambiguous (1754)
create alias ambiguous_on_gynomorph (0) -> gynomorph/ambiguous (1754)
create alias gm/gm (0) -> gynomorph/gynomorph (11714)
create alias gynomorph_on_gynomorph (0) -> gynomorph/gynomorph (11714)
create alias gm/h (0) -> gynomorph/herm (1811)
create alias h/gm (0) -> gynomorph/herm (1811)
create alias gynomorph_on_herm (0) -> gynomorph/herm (1811)
create alias herm_on_gynomorph (0) -> gynomorph/herm (1811)
create alias gm/mh (0) -> maleherm/gynomorph (76)
create alias mh/gm (0) -> maleherm/gynomorph (76)
create alias gynomorph_on_maleherm (0) -> maleherm/gynomorph (76)
create alias maleherm_on_gynomorph (0) -> maleherm/gynomorph (76)

Reason: All based on existing aliases, inspired by someone trying to tag gm/f. Maybe current */a / a/* -> */ambiguous aliases should be changed to avoid ambiguity with andromorph?

EDIT: The bulk update request #284 (forum #296804) has been approved by @Millcore.

Updated by auto moderator

animperfectpatsy said:
Maybe current */a / a/* -> */ambiguous aliases should be changed to avoid ambiguity with andromorph?

Additionally the [gm ag am]] shortcuts can be aliases with the [d ? c] shortcuts (you did m and f here along with the intersexes) in their combinations but it gets weird. There's an alias of every combination for gender_penetrating_gender using [am m fm h mh gm d c] with g not being used for gynomorph because....maybe they just forgot? And a not being uses for andromorph or ambigious because overlap, but then there are also aliases for all the type_penetrating_type which does use the a such as a/p/a, it also uses f for feral (along with [hm hd t] for all combinations of X/p/X but the two system don't overlap but....they could. It does conflict with gender/gender tags though, and those gender/gender aliases are ooooold so I'm not sure they would want to change them to mean something else with how many bots and tag scriptors are likely using them.

Original page: https://e621.net/forum_topics/27445?page=1