Topic: [APPROVED] text_on_clothing BUR

The bulk update request #266 is active.

BUR updated to reflect suggested changes

Reason: These text_on_* tags are missing implications. These implications match the structure of all related clothing/accessory tags.

EDIT: The bulk update request #266 (forum #296304) has been approved by @Millcore.

Gloves are a type of handwear, so text_on_gloves should be implicated to text_on_handwear instead.

Also, odd... how can elbow_gloves be armwear AND handwear at the same time?

monsterbomb10010 said:
Gloves are a type of handwear, so text_on_gloves should be implicated to text_on_handwear instead.

Good catch on that one. I'll have to update the wiki and tags.

Edit: Since I can't change the script, here's the revised implications (also for additional tags that have been created since)
Edit 2: BUR updated to reflect this instead

monsterbomb10010 said:
Gloves are a type of handwear, so text_on_gloves should be implicated to text_on_handwear instead.

Also, odd... how can elbow_gloves be armwear AND handwear at the same time?

Gloves that only cover hand are handwear, if it covers past the wrists it can become an armwear too, I guess, like opera_gloves, for example.

Also elbow gloves has models that can cover part of the hand, thats why it can be armwear/handwear

monsterbomb10010 said:
Also, odd... how can elbow_gloves be armwear AND handwear at the same time?

Not to distract too much from the topic, but plenty of clothes can fall under more than one category (e.g. onesie, one-piece_swimsuit, zero_suit)

Yeah, several types of clothing do fall under multiple categories (such as thigh_socks applying to both footwear and legwear, or corset applying to both topwear and lingerie).

There are a few reservations I have over some of the implications on this BUR.

• I think the implication text_on_gloves -> text_on_armwear should instead be text_on_gloves -> text_on_handwear.
• There should also be an implication text_on_elbow_gloves -> text_on_gloves, which is currently missing from the list.

Other than these, I think the rest of the BUR looks good.

The bulk update request #266 (forum #296304) has been approved by @Millcore.