Topic: [APPROVED] text_on_clothing BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #266 is active.

create implication text_on_armwear (53) -> text_on_clothing (18778)
create implication text_on_arm_warmers (2) -> text_on_armwear (53)
create implication text_on_arm_warmers (2) -> arm_warmers (13851)
create implication text_on_handwear (87) -> text_on_clothing (18778)
create implication text_on_handwear (87) -> handwear (217440)
create implication text_on_gloves (85) -> text_on_handwear (87)
create implication text_on_gloves (85) -> gloves (207492)
create implication text_on_elbow_gloves (29) -> text_on_armwear (53)
create implication text_on_elbow_gloves (29) -> text_on_gloves (85)
create implication text_on_elbow_gloves (29) -> elbow_gloves (42854)
create implication text_on_tank_top (1722) -> text_on_shirt (9330)
create implication text_on_tank_top (1722) -> tank_top (54713)
create implication text_on_vest (63) -> text_on_topwear (11872)
create implication text_on_vest (63) -> vest (23357)
create implication text_on_sweater (205) -> text_on_topwear (11872)
create implication text_on_sweater (205) -> sweater (41838)
create implication text_on_skirt (11) -> text_on_bottomwear (526)
create implication text_on_skirt (11) -> skirt (85647)
create implication text_on_legwear (60) -> text_on_clothing (18778)
create implication text_on_legwear (60) -> legwear (324551)
create implication text_on_leg_warmers (3) -> text_on_legwear (60)
create implication text_on_leg_warmers (3) -> leg_warmers (7216)
create implication text_on_thigh_highs (34) -> text_on_legwear (60)
create implication text_on_thigh_highs (34) -> thigh_highs (144257)
create implication text_on_footwear (141) -> text_on_clothing (18778)
create implication text_on_footwear (141) -> footwear (283894)
create implication text_on_boots (5) -> text_on_footwear (141)
create implication text_on_boots (5) -> boots (81958)
create implication text_on_shoes (84) -> text_on_footwear (141)
create implication text_on_shoes (84) -> shoes (211960)
create implication text_on_socks (49) -> text_on_footwear (141)
create implication text_on_socks (49) -> socks (68978)
create implication text_on_swimwear (319) -> text_on_clothing (18778)
create implication text_on_swimwear (319) -> swimwear (129701)
create implication text_on_dress (22) -> text_on_clothing (18778)
create implication text_on_dress (22) -> dress (91985)
create implication text_on_choker (55) -> choker (46857)
create implication text_on_jewelry (67) -> jewelry (260277)
create implication text_on_scarf (3) -> scarf (49607)

BUR updated to reflect suggested changes

Reason: These text_on_* tags are missing implications. These implications match the structure of all related clothing/accessory tags.

EDIT: The bulk update request #266 (forum #296304) has been approved by @Millcore.

Updated by auto moderator

Gloves are a type of handwear, so text_on_gloves should be implicated to text_on_handwear instead.

Also, odd... how can elbow_gloves be armwear AND handwear at the same time?

monsterbomb10010 said:
Gloves are a type of handwear, so text_on_gloves should be implicated to text_on_handwear instead.

Good catch on that one. I'll have to update the wiki and tags.

Edit: Since I can't change the script, here's the revised implications (also for additional tags that have been created since)
Edit 2: BUR updated to reflect this instead

Updated

monsterbomb10010 said:
Gloves are a type of handwear, so text_on_gloves should be implicated to text_on_handwear instead.

Also, odd... how can elbow_gloves be armwear AND handwear at the same time?

Gloves that only cover hand are handwear, if it covers past the wrists it can become an armwear too, I guess, like opera_gloves, for example.

Also elbow gloves has models that can cover part of the hand, thats why it can be armwear/handwear

Yeah, several types of clothing do fall under multiple categories (such as thigh_socks applying to both footwear and legwear, or corset applying to both topwear and lingerie).

There are a few reservations I have over some of the implications on this BUR.

Other than these, I think the rest of the BUR looks good.