The bulk update request #249 is active.

remove implication human_taur (82) -> human (363285)

Reason: human is only tagged for 100% humans. As such, 'human taurs' do not qualify for the human tag. (Normally humans with non-human bits and extra bodyparts belong in humanoid, but that doesn't apply either since taur and humanoid are separate categories.)

EDIT: The bulk update request #249 (forum #295797) has been approved by @Millcore.

I suppose you are suggesting that it imply humanoid taur instead. It makes sense, especially if what you say about extra human anatomy is true.

thevileone said:
I suppose you are suggesting that it imply humanoid taur instead. It makes sense, especially if what you say about extra human anatomy is true.

It's kinda weird that human + feral = humanoid...

strikerman said:
It's kinda weird that human + feral = humanoid...

This is a strange edge case because human taurs are 100% human with no feral parts they just have extra human parts arranged in a unconventional way.

tittybitty said:
This is a strange edge case because human taurs are 100% human with no feral parts they just have extra human parts arranged in a unconventional way.

Ah, I misunderstood what the tag was for. So human + human = humanoid, then.

strikerman said:
It's kinda weird that human + feral = humanoid...

The human tag just generally seems weird to me. Par for the course for a furry booru, but still...
For example, you can't have a human that is also a feral, can you? For the purpose of tagging, it just stops being human once it crosses some arbitrary line.

The bulk update request #249 (forum #295797) has been approved by @Millcore.