Topic: [APPROVED] Ummm... Penis! (Bulk Update Request)

The bulk update request #196 is active.

Reason: A big list of various penis aliases and implications (and a few pussy/nipples ones).

Edit:

• Altered the alias impossibly_large_penis -> big_penis to now be impossibly_large_penis -> hyper_penis.

Edit 2:

• Removed the alias khaki_penis -> tan_penis and the implication pussyjob -> pussy.

Edit 3:

• Removed the aliases indigo_penis/magenta_penis -> purple_penis.
• Added the implications dark_penis -> penis, light_penis -> penis, penis_accessory -> penis, penis_hug -> penis/hug, penis_kissing -> penis/kissing, penis_nuzzling -> penis/nuzzling, and vibrator_on_penis -> penis.

EDIT: The bulk update request #196 (forum #294693) has been approved by @Millcore.

create alias impossibly_large_penis -> big_penis

Not hyper penis?

Huh, I thought impossibly_large_penis had two other posts on it (besides those deleted posts). That was my main reason for that particular alias, since the penis sizes in the posts I saw would've applied to big_penis. But since those don't seem to be there anymore (and since an alias to hyper_penis does make more since) I'll edit this into the BUR.

Is there any other alterations to the BUR that could be done?

d.d.m. said:
Is there any other alterations to the BUR that could be done?

Nothing else stands out, seems fine to me.

A penis can be anywhere, not necessarily as a part of a crotch. Also what about disembodied parts?

I was using the multi_tone variants to distinguish between > 2 colors, and at least 2 colors, but sure you can alias it I guess.

Do you realize khaki's color range includes brown, tan, and yellow, but you are suggesting it refer to just tan?

I guess pussyjob -> pussy works, but I think there would be cases where the pussy is entirely obscured. Currently penile doesn't imply penis and there is probably a reason for this.

I don't like the knotted_humanoid_penis -> humanoid_penis implication, even though it looks like most of those have already got mass-tagged as humanoid penis. I doubt that hybrid animal penises are what users want to see when they search for 'humanoid_penis'. Not to mention that some of those look like canine penis with added glans.

knotted_humanoid_penis -> glans might be better.

• I was rather split between an implication and an alias for covering_penis/covering_pussy -> covering_crotch (and still feel conflicted over this). Some posts tagged with it don't even have a penis or pussy visible. Though I do suppose covering_penis/covering_pussy could be used in conjunction with the disembodied_* tags.
• I think the multi_tone_* tags should be aliased to their multicolored_* tag counterparts. To me, the phrasing of these tags makes them indistinguishable from the multicolored_* tags. The two_tone_* tags are also used when there are exactly two tones/colors present.
• I can't see a difference between tan and khaki, but I'll remove this alias from the list.
• I suppose not, though I wonder if pussyjob would still apply if it is left ambiguous whether or not the character has a pussy. But I'll remove this implication, just in case.
• I can see the case for de-implicating the [base]_penis tags from their [specific-hybrid]_penis counterpart, though I think that may be best as it's own specific BUR. I'll leave the current implication on this BUR for now (only ~20 posts of the ~600 knotted_humanoid_penis posts are lacking the humanoid_penis tag), but I'll make another BUR specifically on de-implicating these hybrid_penis implications after this BUR is approved/rejected.
• I also don't think the implication knotted_humanoid_penis -> glans would be a good idea, in case the glans part of the penis isn't visible within the post (like why the implication humanoid_penis -> glans isn't used).

I should point out that indigo is actually on the border between blue and purple, but is a shade of blue that may crossover to purple. The two examples that use it are blue, not purple. There isn't much difference from khaki and tan, it is in the tan group, but so is a lot of other shades of tan. If you tag dark khaki as khaki, that is a shade of brown, instead of tan. If there's too much yellow in the khaki, it becomes yellow instead of tan. That being said, khaki is mostly a placeholder color tag for yellowish tans.

As for the whole humanoid debate, I wouldn't mind seeing a humanoid_hybrid_penis, but really I don't have any strong opinions towards the topic.

I'll remove the indigo_penis and magenta_penis aliases since these color tags have been brought up a bit.

I'll also be adding a few additional penis tags to this BUR.

It looks good to me.

The bulk update request #196 (forum #294693) has been approved by @Millcore.

The tag implication tribadism_on_penis -> sex has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

Reason: Implication stuck as "processing".
Implication already exists through another implication.

I ran into an issue with the penis_accessory -> penis implication that was added here. I tried to add cock_ring to this image that contains a cock_ring but doesn't contain a penis:

post #2902640

But cock_ring implies penis_accessory implies penis, so I had to undo my change and settle for ring instead of cock_ring.

khayyam said:
I ran into an issue with the penis_accessory -> penis implication that was added here. I tried to add cock_ring to this image that contains a cock_ring but doesn't contain a penis:

post #2902640

But cock_ring implies penis_accessory implies penis, so I had to undo my change and settle for ring instead of cock_ring.

go to a bur and unimply penis_accessory from penis
you did not needed to revive a old thread

not to mention that in the picture itself there is no confirmation to be a cock ring
it's just a large ring, text does not enquire to twys

The bulk update request #6310 is active.

remove implication penis_accessory (18830) -> penis (1830219)

Reason: A penis accessory does not necessarily imply a penis. Example: post #2902640 contains a cock_ring and no penis, but currently cock_ring implies penis_accessory implies penis. In forum post #388099 this unimply BUR was suggested.

EDIT: The bulk update request #6310 (forum #388101) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6364 is active.

remove implication balls_above_penis (929) -> penis (1830219)
remove implication marsupial_balls (5) -> balls (1258939)

Reason: Balls_above_penis refers to the configuration marsupials have, also known as marsupial_balls. I personally think balls_above_penis is better since it's species-neutral, but it shouldn't imply penis since the balls could be above a sheath.
post #4433304 post #2920297

A question though... should it imply animal_genitalia? and if so, would it actually make more sense for the tag to be marsupial_balls then? thoughts?

Part 2:
alias marsupial_balls -> balls_above_penis

EDIT: The bulk update request #6364 (forum #389003) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6310 (forum #388101) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6364 (forum #389003) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6523 is active.

create alias marsupial_balls (5) -> balls_above_penis (929)

Reason: Followup

EDIT: The bulk update request #6523 (forum #390561) has been approved by @slyroon.

so, animal_genitalia implication y/n?

cloudpie said:
so, animal_genitalia implication y/n?

knot doesn't imply canid genitalia or animal_genitalia

Edit:
Although pseudo-penis implies animal genitalia

The bulk update request #6523 (forum #390561) has been approved by @slyroon.