Forum - [APPROVED] Tag implication: large_forearms -> big_forearms

neurumboom

Member

over 4 years ago

[ti:32591]

Reason: large forearms is a competing tag with big_forearms.

for simplicity's sake let's use the smaller vocabulary of
big_orearms meaning that large forearms implies big forearms.

but I'm not trying to make an implication I would like for
large_forearms to be replaced by big_forearms.

edit* Sorry, I meant to put this in alias.

EDIT: The tag implication large_forearms -> big_forearms (forum #293283) has been approved by @Millcore.

Updated by auto moderator over 4 years ago

user 187249

Member

over 4 years ago

The bulk update request #190 has been rejected.

create alias forearm (0) -> forearms (2239)
create alias big_forearm (0) -> big_forearms (273)
create alias large_forearms (0) -> big_forearms (273)
create alias large_forearm (0) -> big_forearms (273)
create alias forearm_bracelets (0) -> forearm_bracelet (19)
create alias forearms_bracelet (0) -> forearm_bracelet (19)
create alias forearms_bracelets (0) -> forearm_bracelet (19)
create alias forearms_hair (0) -> forearm_hair (873)
create alias forearms_tattoo (0) -> forearm_tattoo (33)
create alias forearms_tuft (0) -> forearm_tuft (221)
create alias forearm_tufts (0) -> forearm_tuft (221)
create alias forearms_tufts (0) -> forearm_tuft (221)
create alias forearms_up (1) -> raised_forearm (86)
create alias forearm_up (0) -> raised_forearm (86)
create alias raised_forearms (0) -> raised_forearm (86)
create implication big_forearms (273) -> forearms (2239)
create implication forearm_bracelet (19) -> forearms (2239)
create implication forearm_bracelet (19) -> bracelet (64244)
create implication forearm_hair (873) -> arm_hair (6825)
create implication forearm_hair (873) -> forearms (2239)
create implication forearm_tattoo (33) -> forearms (2239)
create implication forearm_tattoo (33) -> arm_tattoo (9727)
create implication arm_tattoo (9727) -> tattoo (68127)
create implication forearm_tuft (221) -> arm_tuft (40311)
create implication forearm_tuft (221) -> forearms (2239)
create implication raised_forearm (86) -> raised_arm (27535)
create implication raised_forearm (86) -> forearms (2239)
create implication scaled_forearms (447) -> scales (169605)
create implication scaled_forearms (447) -> forearms (2239)

Reason: Various forearm-related tags.

Since the large_* tags are typically aliased to their big_* counterpart, I concur with aliasing large_forearms -> big_forearms.
Aliasing forearms_up -> raised_forearm to match the format of raised_arm (which had arms_up aliased to it).
Let me know if it would be pointless to utilizing forearms as a base tag, or if it should be used.

EDIT: The bulk update request #190 (forum #294633) has failed: Error: Alias would modify other aliases or implications through transitive relationships. (create alias large_forearms -> big_forearms)

EDIT: The bulk update request #190 (forum #294633) has been rejected by @D.D.M..

Updated by auto moderator over 4 years ago

auto moderator

Janitor

over 4 years ago

The bulk update request #190 (forum #294633) has failed: Error: Alias would modify other aliases or implications through transitive relationships. (create alias large_forearms -> big_forearms)

This BUR failed to go through, likely because of the large_forearms -> big_forearms implication above. That implication will probably need to be rejected first before the BUR can be approved with the auto mod.

auto moderator

Janitor

over 4 years ago

The tag implication large_forearms -> big_forearms (forum #293283) has been approved by @Millcore.

auto moderator

Janitor

over 4 years ago

The bulk update request #190 (forum #294633) has failed: Error: Alias would modify other aliases or implications through transitive relationships. (create alias large_forearms -> big_forearms)