Topic: [REJECTED] Lady and the tramp characters

The bulk update request #94 has been rejected.

create alias lady_(latt) (0) -> lady_(lady_and_the_tramp) (585)
create implication lady_(lady_and_the_tramp) (585) -> lady_and_the_tramp (1671)
create implication tramp (0) -> lady_and_the_tramp (1671)
create implication angel_(lady_and_the_tramp) (710) -> lady_and_the_tramp_2 (46)
create implication scamp (0) -> lady_and_the_tramp_2 (46)
create implication buster_(lady_and_the_tramp) (130) -> lady_and_the_tramp_2 (46)

Reason: I'm surprised that this hasn't been done yet.

If lady_and_the_tramp_2 isn't going to be a thing, then alias it with lady and the tramp.

Also consider adding these aliases for convenience

alias angel_(latt) -> angel_(lady_and_the_tramp)
alias buster_(latt) -> buster_(lady_and_the_tramp)

The BUR wont let me include them.

EDIT: The bulk update request #94 (forum #292535) has been rejected by @Millcore.

I don't think we need a separate tag for the sequel, which is fully titled Lady and the Tramp II: Scamp's Adventure. Just alias it to the main copyright.

Also, Scamp actually far predates that film. Besides debuting in the original Lady and the Tramp, he had his own comic strip for several years.

• Scamp (comics) on Wikipedia
• Scamp daily strips at the INDUCKS (International Network of Disney Universe Comic Knowers and Sources)
• Scamp Sunday strips at the INDUCKS

The bulk update request #94 (forum #292535) has been rejected by @Millcore.

Feel free to redo this one with consideration to the above note from BooruHitomi

The bulk update request #106 is active.

create alias lady_(latt) (0) -> lady_(lady_and_the_tramp) (585)
create implication lady_(lady_and_the_tramp) (585) -> lady_and_the_tramp (1671)
create implication tramp (0) -> lady_and_the_tramp (1671)
create implication scamp (0) -> lady_and_the_tramp (1671)
create implication buster_(lady_and_the_tramp) (130) -> lady_and_the_tramp (1671)

Reason:

EDIT: The bulk update request #106 (forum #292793) has been approved by @Millcore.

The bulk update request #106 (forum #292793) has been approved by @Millcore.