The tag alias #46545 belly_expansion -> belly_inflation has been rejected.

Reason: They aren't different enough to have two separate tags. Also, the wiki for belly inflation is more accurate and more widely applicable.

EDIT: The tag alias belly_expansion -> belly_inflation (forum #292228) has been rejected by @Millcore.

garfieldfromgarfield said:
The tag alias #46545 belly_expansion -> belly_inflation has been rejected.

Reason: They aren't different enough to have two separate tags. Also, the wiki for belly inflation is more accurate and more widely applicable.

expansion and inflation aren't the same things on e621. We already have an ancient implication of belly_expansion -> inflation which shouldn't be a thing but has not been de-implicated .

The bulk update request #89 is active.

remove implication belly_expansion (5372) -> inflation (48069)
create implication belly_expansion (5372) -> expansion (30140)

Reason: Ancient implication, no longer works under the current standard. Not all expansion is inflation.

EDIT: The bulk update request #89 (forum #292508) has been approved by @Millcore.

What's the difference between inflation and expansion?

strikerman said:
What's the difference between inflation and expansion?

Inflation is for the inflation fetish: inflating either the whole body or parts of it by filling it with air, water, cum, etc.

Expansion is for generic expansion. Which can be anything including magic, transformation, growth serums, etc. In many cases the part in question is expanding without any apparent cause or explanation. See post #1583717.

inflation -> expansion implication might be valid, but it doesn't work the other way around.

genjar said:
inflation -> expansion implication might be valid

+1 to that, if that ever gets its own thread. That sounds pretty clear-cut to me?

The bulk update request #89 (forum #292508) has been approved by @Millcore.

The tag alias belly_expansion -> belly_inflation (forum #292228) has been rejected by @Millcore.