The tag implication #31943 foreskin_pull -> foreskin has been rejected.
Reason: It's more or less in the tags.
EDIT: The tag implication foreskin_pull -> foreskin (forum #289640) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.
Updated by auto moderator
Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: foreskin_pull -> foreskin
Posted under General
Yes this would be lovely but as I have brought up Multiple times now
https://e621.net/forum_topics/24683
https://e621.net/forum_topics/24496
All of the foreskin related tags need to be fixed.
The tag implication foreskin_pull -> foreskin (forum #289640) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.
Reason: Implication stuck as "processing".
Re-created in implication #42887.
Updated by bitWolfy