The tag implication #31857 finger_claws -> fingers has been rejected.

Reason: Well, it is on fingers, and a type of claw so...

EDIT: The tag implication finger_claws -> fingers (forum #288060) has been rejected by @Millcore.

I disagree. Some characters have digits that are nothing, but giant claws. I'm not sure whether these should be called fingers or not.

thevileone said:
I disagree. Some characters have digits that are nothing, but giant claws. I'm not sure whether these should be called fingers or not.

Then I guess a wiki change for finger_claws is a must. The Pokemon Zangoose is an example, right?

They might be considered fingers anyways. I'm not sure. I used to tag them as fingers and toes, but I became less sure over time. It would be convenient to have the implication, but for me personally I also tag finger, and claw counts, and the finger count tag implies fingers anyways.

I can see what that tag is supposed to be for, but it is kind of messy.
Some of the posts features paws instead of fingers, though those probably shouldn't be under this tag in the first place.

Then there's posts such as post #2185629, where I can't even figure out why it is tagged as finger_claws.

The tag implication finger_claws -> fingers (forum #288060) has been rejected by @Millcore.