Topic: [Question] Tagging the specific species for gryphons

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

AFAIK, we don't add the specific lion + eagle + hybrid tags to posts because the gryphon tag itself would be enough for people to know the characters are lion/eagle hybrids.

But not all gryphons follow the traditional lion/eagle combination, a lot of gryphon characters take on different feline/bird combinations to make them unique, e.g. a falcon/snow_leopard gryphon.

In this case, should we tag the specific species that make up the gryphon character as well or should we just leave it with gryphon?

Updated by SnowWolf

Imho, if it isn't the "standard" gryphon then I don't see the problem in tagging the specific species as well as tagging it as a hybrid

Updated by anonymous

DiceLovesBeingBlown said:
Imho, if it isn't the "standard" gryphon then I don't see the problem in tagging the specific species as well as tagging it as a hybrid

I'm thinking that way as well, however for the hybrid tag not so much.

Hybrid was specifically left out in implications because they could mean a hybrid of something AND a gryphon. Gryphons and hippogryphs are part of this rule, but chimera was implicated with hybrid since the early days.

There are also taurs and satyrs, but that's opening up a whole different box of problems altogether with half-animals and body types.

Updated by anonymous

Chimera is an awful tag and I hate it. The problem is that someone decided that chimera ought to be the word to describe any hybrid. Which I hate.

The concept -- a tag for critters who's body is obviously different parts -- is a good one, except:

1) a chimera is a specific critter already, made up of a lion, a goat, sometimes a snake and maybe some scorpion. See also: chimera_(mythology)

2) people use this tag all the time for creates who do not meet this idea. I think part of the problem is "this character is identified as a "chimera" so they are clearly a chimera.

Let's find out :D

I'm gonna ignore the low hanging fruit of parent/child and the unapproved picture of "emilynn the western terminator zombie chimera" which will probably be deleted for being human...

THe last 10 (actually 5) chimera posts!

post #1675600 - species are... chimera dragon otter.Looking, these species seem to refer exclusively to jaye_atheron who seems, in other pictures to be a dragon otter. Well I can see that in other pictures of him, but there he just looks like a purple stripey critter that could be an otter with no wings He is not made of obvioust dragon chunk and obvious otter chunks.

Conclusion: Not a chimera, doesn't say he's a chimera though. That I know of.

post #1675303 - 3 character species tags are chimera, dragon, furred dragon and hybrid. Uh. Well, the characters are lelou_(chimera) and ruu_(dragon) Okay. lelou is either the gray one or the red one. The red one seems more likely... but II dunno. Either way, I see a dragon and some kind of canine, and no obvious 'chunks' of species.

Conclusion: Not a chimera, ID's as a chimera.

post #1674930 - the sheep thing is a digimon. I don't know what the other is, but the artist says that they are a chimera "A mix oh Canine, Equine, possibly Cervine or Caprine. And maybe some other stuff too"

conclusion: COULD be a chimera -- but really, looks like a dog with horns and hooves. Self ID'd as a chimera.

post #1673375 - animal_humanoid, chimera -- this is.. er.. not. This should be a manticore, I beleive. There's no info from the artist, it was just one picture of many posted at once.

conclusion: Actually a chimera -- buggy tail, furry legs, human torso! CHIMERA! no self IDing either way.

post #1670159 - This looks like a dog. maybe a digimon. Uploaded by the artist. she is, according to devart tags, a dog goat chimera. she doens't LOOK like it though.

conclusion - not a chimera, self ID's as a chimera

Okay this is taking longer than I thought.

that's 5: 1 chimera and 1 maybe chimera, 3 chimera self-ids.

GLANCING at the next 5, looks like a similar ratio: one chimera, and several hybrids. didn't look to see what people called them.

anyway.

chimera is badly used as a tag, because it's a cool word people like to use to describe characters.

I honestly think I'd get rid of it if I could. Maybe replace it with something like "mix-n-match_body" or something more clever.

gryphon would TECHNICALLY count as a chimera by our rules. but.. yeah.

As for unusual gryphons, I'd tag 'em with different species. I like my sneepgryphs :p

potentially relevant is this set I made

Updated by anonymous

  • 1