fictional species like these probably should not be implied to the irl species they are based on. many of them do not even look like frogs, a lot of them look more like salamanders or some sort of vaguely amphibian things.
post #1105210 post #1646381 post #465664

imo amphibian implication would be better option.

+1, agreed. They should have a base species implication at most.

Yeah, except for the tadpole-tail, those don't look much like frogs to me. So another +1.