Topic: Tag Implication: music -> sound

Implicating music → sound
Link to implication

Reason:

you can't have one without the other

EDIT: The tag implication music -> sound (forum #264423) has been rejected by @Millcore.

-1

Absolutely not. It used to be implicated, then got unimplicated because of all the mistags. Nobody's even cleaned those yet.

See sound -animation -flash and music -animation -flash (all mistags). Music desperately needs a disambiguation.

Didn't realize how much of a mess this is. Would tags such as music_depicted or music_(audio) work?

The tag implication music -> sound (forum #264423) has been rejected by @Millcore.