Implicating multiple_ova → ovum
Link to implication

Reason:

I went through all the images tagged "impregnation" and made sure anything appropriate was tagged "ovum", then went through everything tagged "ovum" and added a new "multiple_ova" tag.
(I hope that's okay)
But it should be clear that multiple_ova implies ovum

EDIT: The tag implication multiple_ova -> ovum (forum #240375) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

Indeed, although we could change the name multiple_ova tag with multiple_ovums to be more clear.

Bumping this one, after the call to bump old implication requests.

There's a few images that slip through on this, but it's a simple alias. Multiple ova, implies there is at least one ovum.

(I don't really agree with the comment above which suggests messing up the pluralisation of the word for some odd consistency)

The tag implication multiple_ova -> ovum (forum #240375) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

dr-spangle said:
Bumping this one, after the call to bump old implication requests.

There's a few images that slip through on this, but it's a simple alias. Multiple ova, implies there is at least one ovum.

(I don't really agree with the comment above which suggests messing up the pluralisation of the word for some odd consistency)

I agree with you, if it does become a problem later, we can always alias multiple_ovums to multiple_ova