De-implicating straight -> male

Reason: Good in theory, but there are images validly tagged straight that contain no male characters in them.
Examples:
post #327913
post #327475

Yeah, I don't think those examples should be tagged with male.
There's none to be seen and cum doesn't always imply male here (fe. herm, dickgirls).

(But I'm not sure that they should be tagged straight either. For the exact same reason.)

Fair enough, and redefining the straight tag to require both male and female characters to be visible(if it's not already, not 100%sure on that one) is certainly another solution to the problem.

Either way, something needs fixed with those tags.

Hammie said:
Fair enough, and redefining the straight tag to require both male and female characters to be visible(if it's not already, not 100%sure on that one) is certainly another solution to the problem.

Either way, something needs fixed with those tags.

There was no problem. Just a mistake.