Implicating wing_claws → claws
Link to implication

Reason:

They are claws.

Related implications:

• wing_claws → wings.¹

Related aliases:

• wingclaws → wing_claws.²

¹ There is no point in using this tag if no wing is shown in the image; in that case, the tag that should be used would be just 'claws'.

² Late additions (21/VI/2017).

EDIT: The tag implication wing_claws -> claws (forum #234901) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

+1. Makes sense.

And what if someone wants search for images containing wings with or without claws? how would people be able to search specifically for them?

Keep in mind what is not relevant to you can and will be relevant to someone else here.

-1 to alias, +1 to implication

Ruku said:
-1 to alias

What alias?

BlueDingo said:
What alias?

mark me mistaken, thout i saw this listed as a alias but i guess not.

The tag implication wing_claws -> claws (forum #234901) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

The bulk update request #6080 is active.

create implication wing_claws (4051) -> claws (554774)
create implication wing_claws (4051) -> wings (420826)

Reason: Well, everyone seemed pretty happy with this one. The suggested alias has already been made.

EDIT: The bulk update request #6080 (forum #385381) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6080 (forum #385381) has been approved by @slyroon.