I have been going through and making sure a lot of images are tagged solo, and of any type of art that should be automatically set for solo are those that are labelled 'model sheet'. Every single one I've come across so far is just the same character in different still poses and angles, if not just one shot.

This change wouldn't apply to 'selfcest', which is an obvious 'captured scene', because they're just standing around statically, so it really is solo, not even clone stuff. Just really detailed solo info, really.

Mods, please change 'model_sheet' to automatically imply 'solo'.
Thanks.

Not necessarily solo:

post #294339
post #317537
post #299847
post #294339

tony311 said:
Not necessarily solo:

post #294339
post #317537
post #299847

Last one I could argue might be solo still, but does involve clone stuff. That leaves two exceptions so far.

If I must, I will go through and label 95% of the 350 remaining art pieces that are 'model_sheet' and not tagged solo.

But this does bring up the question of whether future art pieces should or should not be auto-tagged like that.

What do you do when you have two tags that are usually 'a implies b' with very rare exception? Just leave it for others to choose to manually tag or not?

If there's an exception, then it doesn't happen.

Pyke said:
If there's an exception, then it doesn't happen.

You guys would make terrible uncompromising dictators.

Transducer said:
You guys would make terrible uncompromising dictators.

No, that's just how implications and aliases work. If there are holes in them, we don't put them into effect.

Correct, we only add implications for solid, irrefutable relationships. If even one case exists that contradicts the implication, we can't make it, because that would result in an image with a false tag that cannot be removed.

Even if there were no character_sheets with multiple characters on e621 now (which there are), that doesn't prevent someone from drawing them in the future.

Sorry, you'll have to do manual tagging for this one.

That's mean.

all the facepalm on the internets

tony311 said:
Correct, we only add implications for solid, irrefutable relationships. If even one case exists that contradicts the implication, we can't make it, because that would result in an image with a false tag that cannot be removed.

Even if there were no character_sheets with multiple characters on e621 now (which there are), that doesn't prevent someone from drawing them in the future.

Sorry, you'll have to do manual tagging for this one.

Though it is a nuisance for me to go through them, it's better that logical integrity is upheld in terms of tagging.

Transducer said:
Though it is a nuisance for me to go through them, it's better that logical integrity is upheld in terms of tagging.

Not if it means unfixable mistagging.

Patch said:
That's mean.

Life is mean
Admins are mean

welcome, welcome to e621 17.

ippiki_ookami said:
Not if it means unfixable mistagging.

You misunderstand.
I meant that I ultimately agree with the decision.
Not all model sheet images will have only one character.
It's better to allow for the exceptions.
I even went and fixed a few model_sheet posts that were mistakenly solo.

Transducer said:
You guys would make terrible uncompromising dictators.

Why would you want to be one?

Renard_Queenston said:
Why would you want to be one?

That would be sarcasm.

Also, I love your music.