Implicating breast_expansion -> breasts.

Reason: breast expansion happens to breasts

There's no guarantee that they are exposed.

ippiki_ookami said:
There's no guarantee that they are exposed.

Breasts need to actually be exposed to be tagged?

Well, hundreds of posts are tagged wrong then.

720p said:
Breasts need to actually be exposed to be tagged?

Well, hundreds of posts are tagged wrong then.

Seriously, I was under the impression that we tagged breasts whether they're exposed or not. exposed_breasts isn't a tag either.

http://e621.net/forum/show/62346

Digital_Kindness said:
Seriously, I was under the impression that we tagged breasts whether they're exposed or not. exposed_breasts isn't a tag either.

I've always been tagging non-exposed breasts with breasts and exposed breasts with both breats and nipples.

So why don't we go ahead and imply bulge to penis while we're at it.

720p said:
Breasts need to actually be exposed to be tagged?

Well, hundreds of posts are tagged wrong then.

720p said:
I've always been tagging non-exposed breasts with breasts and exposed breasts with both breats and nipples.

Because of how common of a subject they are, breasts usually don't get tagged unless they're

• Exposed/plainly visible
• A prominent focus of the post (subjective)

So yes, lots of posts tagged with breasts that aren't visible nor the main focus should probably be removed

I only tag clothed breasts if they're large or above.

How about when you see sideboob with no nipples? Should it not be tagged sideboob because that implies breasts?