Implicating Bra -> Underwear.

Reason: such that panties Imply to Underwear

Tauxiera said:
Implicating Bra -> Underwear.

Would you wear Panties/Underwear over your chest though?

Mario583 said:
Would you wear Panties/Underwear over your chest though?

underwear doesn't always imply under there....
it's called underwear because it goes UNDER your clothes.

Mario583 said:
Would you wear Panties/Underwear over your chest though?

Off course not, Panties are worn only on the buttocks or the head...

That'd require a lot of cleanup. I see quite a few bikini bras under the bra tag. They should be renamed to bikini instead of underwear.

Also... What about amazon type females such as Krystal? I wouldn't call her normal outfit underwear.

the panties tag is also visible on many bikini, and whose underwear tag is implicated, the damage is already present but your comment on amazon outfits is interesting.

Actually this is a problem at this level and It is better not to be the implication.

Nevertheless, it would be interesting to clean bikini results in removing tags bra and panties if necessary

The implication was validated.
Well, I would look for clean bikini swimsuit ect ect But it is sometimes difficult to tell if it is a bikini or not...

I'll clear some of the obvious ones as soon as I get some spare time. It's probably safe to assume that most of 'beach' & 'bra' combo are bikinis.

Seems logical.
Panties and bras are underwear, regardless of how they're worn.

In the same way a Polo is still a shirt even if I wear it on my legs.

Tauxiera said:
The implication was validated.
Well, I would look for clean bikini swimsuit ect ect But it is sometimes difficult to tell if it is a bikini or not...

Maybe it can be either/or, depending on the design and setting (you wouldn't normally wear your underwear to the beach, right)

titaniachkt said:
you wouldn't normally wear your underwear to the beach, right

Says you.

I did once (per bond ^^')