Implicating cum_covered -> excessive_cum.

Reason: yep

post #86633
post #46063
post #8743

top and bottom are blacklisted.

What are you trying to say?

This doesn't seem like it's necessarily true. Something can be cum covered without the amount of cum being excessive. Lots of things in the cum_covered tag are covered in a very manageable amount of cum.
Such as post #302772
post #289744
and
post #281022

'excessive' is an awfully subjective term.

Wyvrn said:
This doesn't seem like it's necessarily true. Something can be cum covered without the amount of cum being excessive. Lots of things in the cum_covered tag are covered in a very manageable amount of cum.
Such as post #302772
post #289744
and
post #281022

I wouldn't label any of those as cum_covered, but I guess I see your point.

Despite the consensus here, this tag now seems to be in effect. What's the point of putting things up for discussion if they're just going to be shooed in anyway?

So what's the procedure for asking for a tag implication to be removed?

Digital_Kindness said:
'excessive' is an awfully subjective term.

This should probably be addressed before we implicate/de-implicate anything

The wiki entry for excessive cum is just as subjective:

An image depicting a overly large amount of semen, usually more than necessary.

-

Wyvrn said:
So what's the procedure for asking for a tag implication to be removed?

You could request it in here if it's related to the topic

If not, something like 'Tag de-implication' could work just fine

The wiki entry for excessive cum is just as subjective:

just for the record I kinda did that because if I remember correctly, there wasn't a wiki article for that tag so I created one and.....yeah, probably could use a little updating.