Humans getting aroused by pokemons: pokephiles
Thats well known.

But you can also turn the thing around:
Pokemons getting aroused by humans: anthrophiles?

Such a tag would respect pokemon's (and the people who want to be the pokemon)'s point of view.

And a corresponding tag could also be used in other places.

And it could help to answer the question if the picture shows beastiality or not. Everyone knows what beastiality is in real life, but in the fandom the lines aren't clear. But we know what a human is and that everyone fucking a human must be an anthrophile.

wat

Since when did..? why would..?

Nvm...

WAT

Oh well, everyone else is doing it, so...

wut

Yeah... Remind me never to talk to you at a party. :V Seriously, though, you have way too much time on your hands, dude.

Well. OK. I see that this was a bad idea. Please deletete this topic if you are able to.

n6-2012 said:
Such a tag would respect pokemon's (and the people who want to be the pokemon)'s point of view.

human pokémon rating:e

It doesn't matter whether you're a person looking for poképhilia or a... pokémon... looking for... anthrophilia... you get the same results.

KloH0und said:
human pokémon rating:e

It doesn't matter whether you're a person looking for poképhilia or a... pokémon... looking for... anthrophilia... you get the same results.

There is also pokephilia tag. Which is for any kind pokemon X not-pokemon sex.

Also human pokémon rating:e gives false positives like this:
post #83029
because pokemon is not species, but copyright tag, and few others not relevant images because there could be comic with one scene of 2 pokemon fucking, and another scene with two people fucking, or because of humanized pokemons, or for other reasons.