So, gender tagging always gets a little contentious here, and I'm trying to avoid stepping on any toes with this.
I was trying to add tags to a model sheet for a character that apparently can be either female or herm:
The sheet itself says "female/herm." The character is only drawn as a female, but there is a shot of the penis, presumably for illustrative purposes for the herm form. I ended up tagging it "female" and "penis" together, although this seems a little odd. (I was tempted to add in disembodied_penis, although that particular tag tends to carry implications that aren't really related to the model sheet, any more than the head reference would imply decapitation, I think...) Was there a better way to approach this than what I did? I was hesitant to even add in dickgirl because you never actually see the penis on the body--even though the sheet spells out what the implication is.
More generally, can TWYS draw on text cues in an image? If a picture shows a character with breasts and a penis but any the vulvae are obscured, and it's explicitly labeled "herm," does that still go under "dickgirl"? I might argue that, as long as I'm literate, I do see a herm (the text says so!), even without the anatomical cue.
Updated by titanmelon
