So since I didn't really have anything to do for around 10 minutes, I decided to edit tags about double fellatio performed on males, with the intend of trying to separate between a character fellatioing two or more males, from two characters fellatioing a single male. Then a moment later I saw that double_fellatio had a Wiki stating that it actually covers both. Oops.

So now I'm here requesting tags to differentiate those two very similar but also different scenes with distinct tags like I intended to, I however absolutely have no idea beside the obvious already used double_fellatio, maybe something like multiple_oral_insertion. Double_oral could also be an umbrella tag for double_fellatio as for it being performed on a female instead, it could be double_cunnilingus.

To be more clear, something like :
Two characters or more? working on a deek : Double_fellatio
Two characters or more? working on a vagoo : Double_cunnilingus
Both aliased to double_oral

One character getting two or lots? of deeks: Multiple_oral_insertion
I don't think a character can get multiple orals from vagoos at the same time, so no female counterpart and umbrella tag for this

Hmm, I wouldn't be opposed to this idea.

Instead of multiple_oral_insertion though, why not just multiple_oral?

Yeah I've never liked that part in that particular wiki but the problem has never been solved really. Oral_insertion is very underutilized and oral_penetration probably needs to be cleaned up and aliased to fellatio or something.

I like the idea of something like multiple_oral/multiple_oral_insertion but insertion refers to things that aren't penises, and multiple_oral still runs the risk of being confused with "is it '2 characters on 1 penis' or '1 character on 2 penises'?" which may be problematic. The same could be said for double_oral, double_fellatio, etc.

Tokaido said:
why not just multiple_oral?

I came up with that stupid sounding tag because I first intended to have a female counterpart to it, but since it doesn't seem like it's possible to have, something like multiple_fellatio for deeks and multiple_oral for other stuff could be used, but then it just looks similar to the previous suggested tags

Dual_fellatio = pleasuring two cocks

Double_fellatio = two people on one cock

That doesn't seem consistent with the other double_* tags, though.

double_handjob = one character working on two dicks.
double_footjob = -"-
double_vaginal = one character, penetrated by two dicks.
double_penetration = -"-
etc.

So double_fellatio should be tagged for... single character who's sucking two dicks at once.

Jeez, I really can't come up with a tag that makes sense but with a short name for "two people giving one person a blowjob" :/

Genjar said:
That doesn't seem consistent with the other double_* tags, though.

double_handjob = one character working on two dicks.
double_footjob = -"-
double_vaginal = one character, penetrated by two dicks.
double_penetration = -"-
etc.

So double_fellatio should be tagged for... single character who's sucking two dicks at once.

I already suggested splitting away dual_fellatio and people seemed to like the tag name back then.

dual and double seems a good way to split the two, because I really have no clue what else I could use because on paper they're basically built around the same words structure.

So like Genjar added about double_..., it could then be something like

double_fellatio and double_cunnilingus for one character getting from two characters, both tags aliased to double_oral

dual_fellatio for two characters on a single deek

The issue isn't coming up with a second name exactly, it's making sure they don't get confused with each other. Double_fellatio, dual_fellatio, multi_fellatio, etc. all have the same issue.

The only suggestion I've seen that would differentiate it well enough is collaborative_fellatio, but the name is somewhat clunky.

That being said, if we end up going with double_fellatio/dual_fellatio or similar, it shouldn't be too hard to keep them clean with some minor maintenance. I'd just like to avoid that if possible.

parasprite said:
The only suggestion I've seen that would differentiate it well enough is collaborative_fellatio, but the name is somewhat clunky.

cofellatio (or co-fellatio), then.

I can't think of anything that would make the usage obvious.

...two-on-one_fellatio? Nah, that probably sounds too weird. Though it does get 1000+ hits on Google, mostly porn sites.

I like collaborative_fellatio. It's somewhat clunky, but not that bad, and the distinction is immediately obvious (unlike a dual/double split). One consideration is that collaborative_fellatio inherently scales (it covers n-on-one, for n > 1). I don't think that that is a big problem, since it covers the typical use case fine (someone looking for 2-on-1 is unlikely to be put out by 3-on-1), and the 3+-on-1 case is rare. It does make it difficult for people looking for more than two, but that search would still probably be doable with a -threesome.

I think that dual_fellatio for one and double_fellatio for the other will only end in endless mistagging. It will also probably be irritating for searchers ("Did I want dual_fellatio, or double_fellatio? I can never remember which one is which"). If the breadth of collaborative_fellatio is an issue, I think that two-on-one_fellatio would be a better option than a dual/double split.