Implicating teddy_(clothing) → lingerie
Link to implication

Other types of lingerie that should imply lingerie:

teddiette → lingerie
shelf_bra → lingerie
basque → lingerie

Reason:

A teddy is "A piece of lingerie" (wiki).

How often is teddy_bear going to be mistagged with this?

Tuvalu said:
How often is teddy_bear going to be mistagged with this?

this and also teddy is a p common name

qwertyzzz18c said:
A teddy is "A piece of lingerie" (wiki).

False. I just looked it up on Wikipedia and there's no comment on this.

Furrin_Gok said:
False. I just looked it up on Wikipedia and there's no comment on this.

He's quoting our wiki page.

Tuvalu said:
He's quoting our wiki page.

Where's our citation then? I can't find anything on it outside our site.

Furrin_Gok said:
I can't find anything on it outside our site.

I'm not familiar with it either, but it is listed on wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teddy_(garment)

Genjar said:
I'm not familiar with it either, but it is listed on wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teddy_(garment)

Should probably disambiguate it then to have Teddy_(lingerie) or teddy_(garment) then. It's also known as a camiknicker?

Definitely needs a disambiguation.

parasprite said:
Definitely needs a disambiguation.

If we decide on a tag to use, I can sort through all the posts and tag them with either the clothing or the bear.
Do we want to use teddy_(lingerie) or teddy_(garment)?

I'd say Garment. I never remember how to spell lingerie.

Looking at existing tags, I find nothing ending in _(garment) or _(lingerie).
It looks like the existing pattern is <name>_(clothing).
I'll change the tags, and have edited the implication request.

I've made the following changes:

• Alias: teddy -> teddy_(disambiguation) (approved) - Fortunately someone already cleaned out the tag :D
• Implication: teddy_(clothing) -> lingerie (approved)
• Implication: teddiette -> lingerie (approved)
• Implication: basque -> lingerie (approved)