Aliasing cum_in_clothing → cum_in_clothes
Link to alias

Reason:

standardization
(and cum_on_clothing aliases to cum_on_clothes ).

ListerTheSquirrel said:
Aliasing cum_in_clothing → cum_in_clothes
Link to alias

Reason:

standardization
(and cum_on_clothing aliases to cum_on_clothes ).

Honestly, I would reverse both aliases. cum_on/in_clothing sounds better to me, tbh. Plus, this helps reduce my workload on cum tags.

alias both to cum_through_clothing?

Mutisija said:
alias both to cum_through_clothing?

No, there is most definitely a distinct difference between cum_on_clothing and cum_through_clothing, being that on is just on it, whereas through implies that the character is wearing it and that the cum is soaking through the fabric.

ShylokVakarian said:
No, there is most definitely a distinct difference between cum_on_clothing and cum_through_clothing, being that on is just on it, whereas through implies that the character is wearing it and that the cum is soaking through the fabric.

this thread is about cum IN clothing, not cum ON clothing.

Mutisija said:
this thread is about cum IN clothing, not cum ON clothing.

OP referenced cum_on alias and Shylok was suggesting flipping cum_on and cum_in both to clothing rather than clothes. That's where thread became about both, so when you said "alias both to" speaking of OP alias recommendation, Shylok took it as response to their post.

That said. I'd +1 the:

Alias: cum_in_clothing -> cum_through_clothing
Alias: cum_in_clothes -> cum_through_clothing

And agree with flip of current cum_on_cloth(es/ing) alias to:

Alias: cum_on_clothes -> cum_on_clothing

Would make since given clothes already aliases to clothing.

Mutisija said:
this thread is about cum IN clothing, not cum ON clothing.

Depends on your definition of in. I'm pretty sure we mean where the cum is on the inside of the clothing, not in the fabric of the clothing.

Cum can be in clothing without actually soaking through, so I'm leaving those alone right now.

For OP I've flipped and approved both.