In response to blip #93421
@Grinn3r: so site that hides secure HTTPS connection as obscure user setting when it's supposed to be enforced nowdays, they are now handling money out of all things. What could possibly go wrong?
Responses
In response to blip #93424
@Grinn3r: You made a public blip, and he's just commenting on the fact that FA's security procedures, well, suck. His reply has nothing to do with your blip itself.
@Mairo For that matter, why does FA not use HTTPS by default? Isn't that kinda silly?