In response to blip #74146
@FurFireburst: If it just looks like a human wearing a mask, it's irrelevant to the site. We allow cases where the mask appears to be the actual face, minus whatever was grandfathered from 2014 and earlier.
@FurFireburst: If it just looks like a human wearing a mask, it's irrelevant to the site. We allow cases where the mask appears to be the actual face, minus whatever was grandfathered from 2014 and earlier.
@Ratte:
I fail to see the difference between these posts from ~6 months ago
post #1237503
post #1337225
post #1295945
to my own post seen here: http://i.imgur.com/EWfdALY.png
Comparatively they're similar even "looking like a human wearing a mask".