Doesn’t the female_human tag feel a bit undertagged for anyone else? Ik it’s 15k, but given the amount of content on this site featuring humans, that seems low.
Responses
In response to blip #136787
TitanusOptronix said:
Doesn’t the female_human tag feel a bit undertagged for anyone else? Ik it’s 15k, but given the amount of content on this site featuring humans, that seems low.
My edit count just shot up by like 300 just by adding female_human to a bunch of posts.
In response to blip #136787
TitanusOptronix said:
Doesn’t the female_human tag feel a bit undertagged for anyone else? Ik it’s 15k, but given the amount of content on this site featuring humans, that seems low.
It was less than that it was 11k.
In response to blip #136787
TitanusOptronix said:
Doesn’t the female_human tag feel a bit undertagged for anyone else? Ik it’s 15k, but given the amount of content on this site featuring humans, that seems low.
the <gender>_<form> tags aren't that old, they were aliased away until early '24. so them being underpopulated is to be expected.
In response to blip #136787
TitanusOptronix said:
Doesn’t the female_human tag feel a bit undertagged for anyone else? Ik it’s 15k, but given the amount of content on this site featuring humans, that seems low.
As the guy who spent months tagging all my favorited feral posts, all of the gendered species tags are undertagged.
I really wanted to specifically look for feral that were female and I couldn't because nothing was tagged with *_feral so I had to manually add it to thousands of posts lol