lilly carter (microsoft and etc) created by rory010
Viewing sample resized to 28% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #951186 (learn more) show »
Description

Managed to get the edits on her back and naval piercing.

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • It's kind of funny, really. The inclusion of the BOS tattoo, that is.

    First it's on fur.. so.. more like a dye job.. and second, and this is the most important part, the BOS would consider her a mutant abomination and seek to destroy her.

    Because, you know, Neo-PostApoc-Nazis in super suits.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • AnotherDay said:
    It's kind of funny, really. The inclusion of the BOS tattoo, that is.

    First it's on fur.. so.. more like a dye job.. and second, and this is the most important part, the BOS would consider her a mutant abomination and seek to destroy her.

    Because, you know, Neo-PostApoc-Nazis in super suits.

    There are many furs with tattoos, and I don't see any complaints, firstly.

    Secondly, no one ever said anything about furs having to be completely realistic, so I don't see the issues of having a tattoo.

    Third, the character, being my fursona, has the tattoo because I wanted that on there as my own way of showing my love for the Fallout franchise. She's not in any way in the brotherhood of steel nor associated with the universe.

    I can understand those being valid points if; 1. This was your character, 2. She was used in the fallout universe. or 3. If I was expected to be realistic with my fursona.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • No one said anything about furries having to have organs, either, and yet you see plenty of people mocking the fact that so many don't.

    All of my points are valid because they're my opinion, you may not like them, but, hey, I'm not attacking you and just pointing out some amusing details.

    You didn't need to pick apart what I said and, frankly, I take offense that you went to the effort to do so, I mean.. I'm not sitting here calling you names or being mean. Heck, I didn't even say that anything should change or be different, now did I?

    No, I didn't.

    So why be defensive? It's like if I had said "You know, it's funny, strawberry jam really isn't that good" on an advert for strawberry jam and you coming along and making points how I'm wrong and what I said is bad and how I have no right and what I said isn't valid since I don't own the jam in question and the jam isn't owned by a certain company.

    Seriously. Can't I just comment in the comment section and give my opinion on what I casually see instead of having someone like you take it as some sort of personal challenge?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • *After picking apart a personal detail on a character*

    AnotherDay said:
    You didn't need to pick apart what I said

    *Then proceeds to write paragraphs about it*

    AnotherDay said:
    I take offense that you went to the effort to do so

    *You start to complain*

    AnotherDay said:
    Seriously. Can't I just comment in the comment section and give my opinion on what I casually see instead of having someone like you take it as some sort of personal challenge?

    *That Everyone else is being defensive...

    AnotherDay said:
    So why be defensive?

    Glass houses...

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
  • Don't question furry logic. Moral of the story. Look, friends, not questioning things is why we're here. When you begin to question tattoos you start to see in universe explanations like, "there's a special dye" and it's unnecessary. For more on not questioning things see rabid's "INCONCEIVABLE!".

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Nine months and still no answer? Well for posterity's sake:

    Lilly_Rose_carver said:
    FA hugbox? Forgive my ignorance, but what's that?

    FurAffinity has a reputation for fans of popular artists, if not several artists themselves, ruthlessly shutting down any and all criticism, even constructive.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • PEOPLE OF THE COMMONWEALTH, DO NOT INTERFERE, OUR INTENTIONS ARE PEACEFUL, WE ARE THE BROTHERHOOD OF STEEL.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0