mikhaila kirov created by tsampikos
Viewing sample resized to 91% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • I am curious, why is this the page she suddenly started getting tagged as a cuntboy when the previous pages she's female? In this comic we know Mik is a girl and I want to change the tags as such but you can't seem to do that without starting a war.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • Homekeys said:
    I am curious, why is this the page she suddenly started getting tagged as a cuntboy when the previous pages she's female? In this comic we know Mik is a girl and I want to change the tags as such but you can't seem to do that without starting a war.

    Because one admin got it up their ass that a lack of breasts means cuntboy.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 15
  • NotMeNotYou said:
    The lack of feminine body physique makes this a girly cuntboy.

    And I highly recommend not insulting my staff.

    Staff or not they are wrong deal with it. Stop being so egocentric.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Kronau said:
    Staff or not they are wrong deal with it. Stop being so egocentric.

    Just because someone is, wrong or maybe a mistake or is doing their job. Never provide the base to insult them over it seriously people wonder why alot of people have hostile attitudes towards everyone. It's because of things like this were everyone is so quick to go a blast someone for no good reasson then they get mad or in shock when there is action taken agasint them and they act like they did nothing wrong

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • I hate to be that one. Yet the ARTIST clearly states that the Otter Girl here is, in fact, a GIRL. Flat Chest very fit GIRL. So we going to argue with the one who created the character or going to end up have all of this art deleted from this site and the Artist demanding any upload of the subject matter be bannable.

    So. Is she a cuntboy? No, she is not. Is she very fit and very boyish? Yes, yet she is still a woman. As she was born that way and her livelihood built her the way she is. As there are only two genders. Male and Female. Regardless of what those Liberal PC people think.

    Mikhaila is a girl and the artist has written the record of stating this fact. There.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • Master_Snipe said:
    I hate to be that one. Yet the ARTIST clearly states that the Otter Girl here is, in fact, a GIRL. Flat Chest very fit GIRL. So we going to argue with the one who created the character or going to end up have all of this art deleted from this site and the Artist demanding any upload of the subject matter be bannable.

    So. Is she a cuntboy? No, she is not. Is she very fit and very boyish? Yes, yet she is still a woman. As she was born that way and her livelihood built her the way she is. As there are only two genders. Male and Female. Regardless of what those Liberal PC people think.

    Mikhaila is a girl and the artist has written the record of stating this fact. There.

    Cool story bro, but this site uses Tag What You See rules with the exception of character names. The artist can say that their character is a potato for all we care, but this is still getting tagged as cuntboy.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -10
  • I understand that those are the rules as they stand, but I thought the idea of the tags was to easily find what we were after as search terms.

    A user after an intersex male with a vag might see this, be happy enough but be annoyed when they realise the character was deisgned as a flat female. That is partially a failure in tags. A user after females with no care as too the volume of breasts would miss this. That is also a failure in tagging. A user after a cboy might not care, it looks enough like a cuntboy indeed that it falls under the current tags, but that's 1/3. In this example, the current rules are objectively too short to cover what is the wanted outcome.
    I'm not going to insult anybody, enforcing the rules whether as a volunteer mod or what is a tough task and I really appreciate it, I just feel that sometimes they abjectly aren't fit for purpose.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 12
  • Admin, when you go walking around on the street and you see a woman with a flat chest, do you call them a man? Because...that's far from okay.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 9
  • NotMeNotYou said:
    They aren't wrong because they follow our established rules, rules that have been in place long before you've created your account here.

    Do you hold your own rules in higher regard than the character creator's decision for the character? In what concept is a male the same as a female?

    Being an admin or moderator does not automatically mean you are correct in your decision. You need to be accountable for what your decisions mean.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 12
  • tegra said:
    Couldent we just get it tagged as tomboy because thats how i see it

    Right, because one personal opinion is certainly grounds for changing it for everyone.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • comealongpond said:
    Do you hold your own rules in higher regard than the character creator's decision for the character?

    Yes, that's how our tagging rules work.

    comealongpond said:
    In what concept is a male the same as a female?

    The cuntboy tag is a label for that particular combination of genitalia and bodily physique. The gender the character identifies as is completely irrelevant to tagging, the tags are only there to help searching.
    If something can't be taken from the image directly it's not supposed to be tagged. For things like that we do have a wiki and descriptions, in which those things can be stated or explained.

    comealongpond said:
    Being an admin or moderator does not automatically mean you are correct in your decision. You need to be accountable for what your decisions mean.

    We discuss these things internally, unless they are very clear cut.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -8
  • NotMeNotYou said:
    Yes, that's how our tagging rules work.

    The cuntboy tag is a label for that particular combination of genitalia and bodily physique. The gender the character identifies as is completely irrelevant to tagging, the tags are only there to help searching.
    If something can't be taken from the image directly it's not supposed to be tagged. For things like that we do have a wiki and descriptions, in which those things can be stated or explained.

    We discuss these things internally, unless they are very clear cut.

    Obviously you're free to do as you like, you're a private group. But know that this is heavily regarded as disrespectful of the artist, to describe this with a term that here means something completely different than its original intended meaning, thus possibly detracting from a user's understanding.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • NotMeNotYou said:
    Yes, that's how our tagging rules work.

    The cuntboy tag is a label for that particular combination of genitalia and bodily physique. The gender the character identifies as is completely irrelevant to tagging, the tags are only there to help searching.
    If something can't be taken fr
    om the image directly it's not supposed to be tagged. For things like that we do have a wiki and descriptions, in which those things can be stated or explained.

    We discuss these things internally, unless they are very clear cut.

    I understand cuntboy is tagged by the lack of female physique, but where exactly do you see that? I mean the only lack of female physique are the breasts which can simply be flatchested , so except for that mikhaila is everything if not female

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • notmenotyou said:
    The lack of feminine body physique makes this a girly cuntboy.

    And I highly recommend not insulting my staff.

    fuck you and fuck your staff. your rules are wrong and so are you. don't reply to me.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3