A male fox fucking a female? what the hell?

shedletsky said:
A male fox fucking a female? what the hell?

No, that's all right, it is "cuntboy" in tags

Derret said:
No, that's all right, it is "cuntboy" in tags

Ummm female tag bra

Zemodo said:
Ummm female tag bra

It's a male: source says it's a "Cboy"; masculine face (and hair), and underwear; no noticeable female traits. Tagging it Male and Cuntboy until a person can point out female details on them, with emphasis on details, not the vagina.

Its Tag what you see. Since you cant see the chest you assume its a female , what the source says doesn't matter.

Hell it could even be a herm for that matter. Tag wars already

Tag What You See is a nice concept, but a pretty poor practice. It causes more problems than it fixes. If there's source material that clearly states details, the tags should really reflect that. If not, then Tag What You See is great, but otherwise it's just going to infuriate people that know otherwise, causing unnecessary drama.

I've seen mods tell people that if the source says what he/she/it is, then it goes in the tags. Period. If it's a cunt boy, tag it as a cunt boy.

Rayzr said:
I've seen mods tell people that if the source says what he/she/it is, then it goes in the tags. Period. If it's a cunt boy, tag it as a cunt boy.

got a source on that?

Rayzr said:
I've seen mods tell people that if the source says what he/she/it is, then it goes in the tags. Period. If it's a cunt boy, tag it as a cunt boy.

Show me this mod telling people incorrect information?
I highly doubt that you ever even read what your talking about.
Far as I can tell this looks like a female, for starters all we can see is the vag. The chest and pubic mound (where a herms bits go) are hidden. The body is mostly hidden as well meaning no hints from body architecture (hips, body shape, etc)

Tags: the most confusing shit ever made since bra straps.

Character is Kiniel, a cuntboy. According to twys this wouldn't matter, but since we can't see if the character has breasts (he does not):

But sometimes even the apparent gender isn't obvious; in these cases, an administrator will need to make the final decision.

Réaime said:
that's what gets ya poopdick, son

My friend calls everyone a poop dick. Sounds like y'all have some experience.

DarkKnightSiralExan said:
It's a male: source says it's a "Cboy"; masculine face (and hair), and underwear; no noticeable female traits. Tagging it Male and Cuntboy until a person can point out female details on them, with emphasis on details, not the vagina.

if we're going by facial details alone, the fox seems effeminate, don't you think?

are we tagging dickgirl as well?

Knotty_Curls said:
if we're going by facial details alone, the fox seems effeminate, don't you think?

Which fox doesn't though?

Since this argument has continued for longer than it should have, I have gotten an admin to explain why this image is a cuntboy and a male having sex. Since I cannot seem to explain why, and doubt anyone else can explain without drawing further questions and stress (for lack of better word), we might as well get someone who can explain it and whom will stop this. I apologize to the people who don't like this, and that includes the admin...

Esme_Belles said:
Show me this mod telling people incorrect information?
I highly doubt that you ever even read what your talking about.
Far as I can tell this looks like a female, for starters all we can see is the vag. The chest and pubic mound (where a herms bits go) are hidden. The body is mostly hidden as well meaning no hints from body architecture (hips, body shape, etc)

So you're telling me a female is going to wear blue "whitey tighteys"? Didn't think so.
Oh yes, let me just scrounge through e621 for all the old shit that the admins acted like nitwits on.
Oh wait, all I have to do is wait a few days and that'll happen on it's own.
Go take a good look for yourself. You clearly haven't been on e621 long enough to know how many times the admins / mods have done this kind of thing. The rules have become so fickle that following them is hazardous now because you'll eventually be in the wrong at some point. Calm yourself and wait for the admin / mod to post on the image.

Rayzr said:
So you're telling me a female is going to wear blue "whitey tighteys"? Didn't think so.

alright, time to start tagging all ambiguous dress-wearers as female

Oh man.
This is entertaining.
I love the furry community, you guys crack me up. So much tension over tagging

Cuntboy seems most appropriate.

Rayzr said:
So you're telling me a female is going to wear blue "whitey tighteys"? Didn't think so.

~

Go take a good look for yourself. You clearly haven't been on e621 long enough to know how many times the admins / mods have done this kind of thing.

First of all, I have a pair of "tighty whities" there isn't anything stopping a girl from wearing boy underwear...well unless you prefer the stereo type cotton or lace.

Second, I have been a member of this site since 2010, four years longer than you. I understand how the site works pretty darn well.
And there's the admin (ratte), so cuntboy it is.

Esme_Belles said:
First of all, I have a pair of "tighty whities" there isn't anything stopping a girl from wearing boy underwear...well unless you prefer the stereo type cotton or lace.

Second, I have been a member of this site since 2010, four years longer than you. I understand how the site works pretty darn well.
And there's the admin (ratte), so cuntboy it is.

♫ If you're wondering how they tag and search, and other science facts

(La, la, la)

then just repeat to yourself 'It's just a site, I should really just relax.'

Mystery Science Theaterrrrr - Six-Two-Ooooone ♫

no but seriously there's no reason to get this worked up over something so silly

Why are you guys actually arguing over the tags anyway? Did I miss something or is this your everyday schedule?

Esme_Belles said:
First of all, I have a pair of "tighty whities" there isn't anything stopping a girl from wearing boy underwear...well unless you prefer the stereo type cotton or lace.

Second, I have been a member of this site since 2010, four years longer than you. I understand how the site works pretty darn well.
And there's the admin (ratte), so cuntboy it is.

Funny how you judge how long somebody has been somewhere based on how long their account has existed. I've been with e621 for far longer than you, child, whether my profile says it or not.

Wow! It's a cuntboy! It's as if we were correct all along!
And you weren't?
Surprising!

Veriaenom said:
Why are you guys actually arguing over the tags anyway? Did I miss something or is this your everyday schedule?

You missed the subtext where all the people who fapped when they thought this was a girl, realized it was a cuntboy, and couldn't admit to themselves.

...

Also, it's pretty much everyday for most people on e621.

Oh, let's talk about the relevance of lol_comments next, it'll be all meta!

Lufteluke said:
Oh, let's talk about the relevance of lol_comments next, it'll be all meta!

Unnecessary drama over something silly qualifies lol_comments

Knotty_Curls said:
got a source on that?

There is no need for a source... Its a cuntboy

Zemodo said:
Ummm female tag bra

I'm so glad you're banned

_index said:

I'm so glad you're banned

I know I really shouldn't say anything, but...