I see you Homestuck. You can't hide.

damn i was hoping the gameboy was an easteregg or something to add to the fun lol, but it's good either way XD

Her pupils are hearts. Dawww :3

Well that was a quick upvote and favorite.
Didn't even have to think about it, weird.

Bazzal said:
Her pupils are hearts. Dawww :3

Its a he.

cutexfemboy said:
Its a he.

I see no evidence of it being male honestly.
The face isn't the absolute most feminine ever, but everything else screams female, albeit flat-chested.

It's hard to tell (may very well be male). But I think it should be ambiguous_gender.

Wow. This is pretty damn good. :)

Drawk said:
The character, berry valentine, is a he :v

*ahem* twys

Source info is irrelevant

Tag what you see. Anyway, the artist can change the gender of any known character they draw, no matter their original gender.

Dunnno said:
I see no evidence of it being male honestly.
The face isn't the absolute most feminine ever, but everything else screams female, albeit flat-chested.

It's hard to tell (may very well be male). But I think it should be ambiguous_gender.

if you click the character link berry valentine you will see in all of the other pictures that berry valentine has a dick and is therefore a dewd

It's a guy, people. The fact that people have the sauce right there and still want to tag it to whatever is favorable to their boner is just silly.

While you're at it, why don't you change the two other images based off of this one that have been tagged male/male for ages?

loveless00 said:
It's a guy, people. The fact that people have the sauce right there and still want to tag it to whatever is favorable to their boner is just silly.

While you're at it, why don't you change the two other images based off of this one that have been tagged male/male for ages?

Not ambiguous gender. Berry Valentine has never been portrayed as a woman. That and the fact that the parent posts (now added) have the non-animated version tagged as male/male

(https://e621.net/post_tag_history/index?post_id=721984)

You don't seem to get how things actually roll here. Older posts having been mistagged is in no way a valid argument to mistag new ones, as are sources that state sexes. People changing this to ambiguous_gender most probably aren't doing it because it's favorable to their boner, but because there's really no way to tell Berry's in fact male here.

That's the issue with posting excessively girly guys in a place that has a Tag What You See system: don't show the bits or even the lack of mammaries, and they quickly tend to appear female (by facial structure, body shape etc) to the point where even a female tag wouldn't be blatantly out of place. As it is, I'm fine sticking with ambiguous, but male?

Hello? twys?

Try actually reading the above link before you tag anything since tag history for characters is irrelevant.
post #721994 post #721990
It is not uncommon for a character to be tagged with different genders, no matter what the source states it to be.

unknown_or_anonymous said:
Tag what you see. Anyway, the artist can change the gender of any known character they draw, no matter their original gender.

pizzaface22 said:
damn i was hoping the gameboy was an easteregg or something to add to the fun lol, but it's good either way XD

Am I not the only one who holds down tab while playing flashes?

Jugofthat said:
You don't seem to get how things actually roll here. Older posts having been mistagged is in no way a valid argument to mistag new ones, as are sources that state sexes. People changing this to ambiguous_gender most probably aren't doing it because it's favorable to their boner, but because there's really no way to tell Berry's in fact male here.

That's the issue with posting excessively girly guys in a place that has a Tag What You See system: don't show the bits or even the lack of mammaries, and they quickly tend to appear female (by facial structure, body shape etc) to the point where even a female tag wouldn't be blatantly out of place. As it is, I'm fine sticking with ambiguous, but male?

You give the people here WAAAY too much credit if you don't think they change it to suit their preferences.

Whatever though, you guys enjoy your non-existent girl or cboy or dickgirl or w/e you're imagining as you're fapping to a dude.

Sweet Jesus would you all shut the fuck up and just jack your dicks off already. You're taking a good thing and making it toxic with all this gender identity bullshit. You know what?! I dont see any genitals, so therefore the character is genderless.

Why does everyone have to play the "Technical" game. Its like listening to Tumblritas complaining about people checking their pronouns. Its a dude, end of story. You can tag it differently all you want, it wont change anything. If it makes your boner feel better that the tag says "Oh well it might be a girl this ONE time" then who cares, but there's no denying what it really is, we all know, people acting like they'll have a guilty boner if it says male/male i swear.

Of course it's a dude, I'm not denying that at all, but that's not the point here.

forum #170911

An admin has already ruled in favour of male/ambiguous, so any further discussion is futile.

Eve_McFadden said:
Why does everyone have to play the "Technical" game. Its like listening to Tumblritas complaining about people checking their pronouns. Its a dude, end of story. You can tag it differently all you want, it wont change anything. If it makes your boner feel better that the tag says "Oh well it might be a girl this ONE time" then who cares, but there's no denying what it really is, we all know, people acting like they'll have a guilty boner if it says male/male i swear.

The idea of a twys system is that people searching for a specific tag (like a gender) will turn up results that *visually* match. If someone wants a female, this is close enough if you don't know the backstory, so it's a valid result. Same for ambiguous, and same for male, in this case. It's about returning relevant results to searches, not trying to feel better about a boner.

sector7goddess said:
The idea of a twys system is that people searching for a specific tag (like a gender) will turn up results that *visually* match. If someone wants a female, this is close enough if you don't know the backstory, so it's a valid result. Same for ambiguous, and same for male, in this case. It's about returning relevant results to searches, not trying to feel better about a boner.

And then what happens when they think "Hey I like this character, lemme click the character link"? and I know it has nothing to do with guilty boners, I'm saying people act likes its really that huge of a deal to be so damn specific in their tagging or else all the "check your tags" army will flood them with complaints.

Eve_McFadden said:
And then what happens when they think "Hey I like this character, lemme click the character link"? and I know it has nothing to do with guilty boners, I'm saying people act likes its really that huge of a deal to be so damn specific in their tagging or else all the "check your tags" army will flood them with complaints.

It's time to drop it, Eve. The ignorant sheeple have spoken. It's "twys" because a combination of twys and twyk is too complicated for most of them, and the rest of them encourage it and shamelessly defend the others indirectly.

The most we can do at this point is inform those that care to know in replies, which is what I'm doing from now on.

Ehm... Artist here. though animated pretty recently, this drawing was done 2 years ago, and at that time it caused the exact same discussion, but whats worse is that people even noted me because they HOPED berry was a girl, only to be showered by a rain of dicks, ive even got requests of making him a girl.

I personaly dont mind the "ambiguous gender" tag for this pic specificly (since its not showing thanks to the angle, and youre free to think whatever you preffer), but it will pretty likely deceive people like it did in the past, some straight guy clicking the berry tag only to find dicks upon dicks, how disapointing :/.

nedoiko said:
Ehm... Artist here. though animated pretty recently, this drawing was done 2 years ago, and at that time it caused the exact same discussion, but whats worse is that people even noted me because they HOPED berry was a girl, only to be showered by a rain of dicks, ive even got requests of making him a girl.

I personaly dont mind the "ambiguous gender" tag for this pic specificly (since its not showing thanks to the angle, and youre free to think whatever you preffer), but it will pretty likely deceive people like it did in the past, some straight guy clicking the berry tag only to find dicks upon dicks, how disapointing :/.

THANK YOU

nedoiko said:
...some straight guy clicking the berry tag only to find dicks upon dicks, how disapointing :/.

Heh, I think the tag war I initiated was more of a turn off than that.

blakashawa said:
Hello? twys?

Try actually reading the above link before you tag anything since tag history for characters is irrelevant.
post #721994 post #721990
It is not uncommon for a character to be tagged with different genders, no matter what the source states it to be.

Golly gee, so much can change for a character in two years.

You can clearly see this character doesn't have any breasts, which is enough groups to tag male

I can't believe we've been doing this for 3 years

This uhm.. this character strangely ressembles a lot my friends fursona, weird