patchi created by ratte
Viewing sample resized to 70% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

Art by Ratte
Commissioned by Patch

-----

Please consider supporting my work if you enjoy it:

https://www.patreon.com/ratte
https://ko-fi.com/ratteart
https://commiss.io/ratte

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Patch said:
    I am still so fucking adorable.

    furballs_dc said:
    Yes. super daw. :3

    It seems that we are all in agreement.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • Stop changing this to ambiguous_gender.

    It's clear that the character is female. It has female features. Look at the eyelashes, the facial structure and the face in general. Female tag.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Hmm.... I'm really seeing more female than ambiguous as it has the eyelashes, the structure, etc

    As for that other one, I'd probably have tagged that female as well as the face really has a feminine structure

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Since you all were choosing between female and ambiguous (the latter is more likely), let's say it's a gay male :P

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • DobiesHot said:
    I really adore this drawing. The artist has a great style!

    Yeah Ratte is an amazing artist and did wonderful work with my fursona.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Patchi said:
    Yeah Ratte is an amazing artist and did wonderful work with my fursona.

    It seems Ratte created a dispute for your fursona's gender in the process, however! Regardless of tags, this feminine feline is still quite beautiful, especially with those shimmering blue eyes.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Patchi said:
    Yeah Ratte is an amazing artist and did wonderful work with my fursona.

    I've seen a lot of work of this artist'a, he rally does deserve all these great comments. He has inspired me quite much to try more with my own art. Instead of being single-minded like I usually am.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Nireuru said:
    I agree. It has strong feminine structure, but nothing defining. Since both of these images fall under the "androgynous" definition from the "Tagging Rules" page, it's only right to tag them as such.

    "Androgynous:
    If the character in the image is definitely male or female but is drawn or portrayed in such a way as to make it difficult to distinguish this, then this tag is appropriate."

    Why should this be disputed if the owner of the character herself is saying this is female?

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • DSTakumiDerp said:
    Why should this be disputed if the owner of the character herself is saying this is female?

    We don't go off of what the owner says except for the character's name. We tag what we see. Personally, I see a female

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Patchi, Moon Moon, SirAntagonist and CamKitty, why do all of these users have this picture?! Patchi, I understand, but seriously?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • K4RN4GE911 said:
    Patchi, Moon Moon, SirAntagonist and CamKitty, why do all of these users have this picture?! Patchi, I understand, but seriously?

    https://e621.net/forum/show/132394

    Started there, became an in joke thing. Also a bit of a Patchi appreciation week since I think she is in the hospital or something. But started as it being funny

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1