mother goat (the wolf and the seven little goats and etc) created by mospal3
Description

The important message of the "My Little Goat" short.

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Comment section has been locked.

    vk2002 said:
    the discord mods aren't gonna like this one

    The e6 mods won't like it much either.

    Updated by Millcore


    User received a warning for the contents of this message.
  • |
  • 182
  • the_vegan said:
    Its never okay to kill yourself

    So I wont

    It reminds me of a meme about a character replying to the question "what's his favorite category of porn" like this:
    "not only the men, but the women... and the chil-"

  • |
  • 20
  • rnewhall said:
    I prefer to torture the pedo then to out right kill him and let's be honest it's always a him the same way he tortured his victims. By that I mean sexually tortured. Months on end till he breaks mentally and reverts to a child like state crying for his mommy. Then and only then dose he have my permission to die. But I won't do it, instead he'll have to do it himself.

    Fucking saw over here not even gonna lie.

  • |
  • 29
  • rnewhall said:
    I prefer to torture the pedo then to out right kill him and let's be honest it's always a him the same way he tortured his victims. By that I mean sexually tortured. Months on end till he breaks mentally and reverts to a child like state crying for his mommy. Then and only then dose he have my permission to die. But I won't do it, instead he'll have to do it himself.

    a lot more female pedos don't get caught cause of 'reasons', though torturing may be overkill.

  • |
  • 53
  • rnewhall said:
    I prefer to torture the pedo then to out right kill him and let's be honest it's always a him the same way he tortured his victims. By that I mean sexually tortured. Months on end till he breaks mentally and reverts to a child like state crying for his mommy. Then and only then dose he have my permission to die. But I won't do it, instead he'll have to do it himself.

    Not so much always a him, just your bias. Plenty of female peds out there that y'all just don't give a rip about.

  • |
  • 45
  • frost92 said:
    Ditto

    Ciertamente
    [/quote]

    Mais oui c'est clair
    [/quote]

    ้žๅธธใซๆญฃ็ขบใชๆƒ…ๅ ฑใ€ใ‚ใ‚ŠใŒใจใ†ใ”ใ–ใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚

  • |
  • 1
  • hellpad said:
    The e6 mods won't like it much either.

    No way you received a warning for this. Seems like the mods are butt hurt.

    Updated by bitWolfy


    User received a warning for the contents of this message.
  • |
  • 78
  • bitwolfy said:
    What kind of defense did you expect?
    You are defending a guy who is heavily implying that I am a pedophile. You are saying that he did not deserve a warning for that.
    I am not a pedophile. Nobody on the staff team is a pedophile. He is just posting inflammatory comments, knowing that it will rile people up.

    And now you stand here and say that you are not trolling.
    Get lost.

    Just say you aren't a pedo then, warning this many people and banning someone for 2 weeks is a bad look

    Edit: yes I know the temp banned guy told a creep to off themself, but that makes no sense as a ban since the post is telling people to kill said creeps.

    Edit numba 2: damn homie got permabanned

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • bitwolfy said:
    What kind of defense did you expect?
    You are defending a guy who is heavily implying that I am a pedophile. You are saying that he did not deserve a warning for that.
    I am not a pedophile. Nobody on the staff team is a pedophile. He is just posting inflammatory comments, knowing that it will rile people up.

    And now you stand here and say that you are not trolling.
    Get lost.

    I simply said you were butt hurt, which it seems you are. That is all. Stop throwing a fit

  • |
  • 21
  • bitwolfy said:
    What kind of defense did you expect?
    You are defending a guy who is heavily implying that I am a pedophile. You are saying that he did not deserve a warning for that.
    I am not a pedophile. Nobody on the staff team is a pedophile. He is just posting inflammatory comments, knowing that it will rile people up.

    And now you stand here and say that you are not trolling.
    Get lost.

    A. It was obviously a joke.
    B. Warning me for trolling just looks stupid considering the context
    C. Warning someone who made a joke about me getting warned just makes it worse.
    D. The only people I seem to have riled up was the mod that warned me, and you.

    Like wtf bro it wasn't a personal attack. Ofc ik every discord mod isn't a pedo, the same applies to e6 mods.

    I was not trolling.

    Updated

  • |
  • 23
  • Let's not forget zoophiles. Especially the ones who disguise themselves as furries to make the community look baad.

  • |
  • 10
  • Comment section is a landmine.

    By the way, how many people has in their fav cub content?

  • |
  • 11
  • hellpad said:
    Fucking saw over here not even gonna lie.

    Hello [name here] I wanna play a little game.... one stays, one goes... cock or balls.... make your choice

  • |
  • 7
  • dr_liam said:
    Hello [name here] I wanna play a little game.... one stays, one goes... cock or balls.... make your choice

    You have 30 seconds

  • |
  • 5
  • coolmintyfreshness said:
    "User received a warning for the contents of this message."

    I'd make the classic "what's the difference between a joke and big black cocks?" joke, but I'd probably get warned for it given the track record of this comment section.

  • |
  • 0
  • hellpad said:
    A. It was obviously a joke.
    B. Warning me for trolling just looks stupid considering the context
    C. Warning someone who made a joke about me getting warned just makes it worse.
    D. The only people I seem to have riled up was the mod that warned me, and you.

    Like wtf bro it wasn't a personal attack. Ofc ik every discord mod isn't a pedo, the same applies to e6 mods.

    I was not trolling.

    Well put, sir/ma'am/formal gender-neutral term

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • zelripheth said:
    Not all countries have the same laws.
    You can still get imprisoned for murder even if you acted in self defense.

    Digaselo al juez en la corte!

  • |
  • 0
  • ginkei said:
    Comment section is a landmine.

    By the way, how many people has in their fav cub content?

    I'm willing to admit I do, fantasy does not equate reality.

  • |
  • 3
  • And ITT we can see a substantially-sized gaggle of humans who have either never heard or have failed to understand the definition of the word paedophilia, but decided to comment regardless. Notice how they all follow the leader without any consideration. This is an increasingly common occurrence, as intellectual laziness spreads amongst the species.

  • |
  • -8
  • wlkwos said:
    And ITT we can see a substantially-sized gaggle of humans who have either never heard or have failed to understand the definition of the word paedophilia, but decided to comment regardless. Notice how they all follow the leader without any consideration. This is an increasingly common occurrence, as intellectual laziness spreads amongst the species.

    You have a post defending zoophilia in your favourites.

  • |
  • 3
  • dirtyratmatt said:
    You have a post defending zoophilia in your favourites.

    Checked your claim, don't think that's defending zoophilia. At least I hope it isn't. Seems more like a point that it's weird what we do allow and what we don't. Ultimately I don't necessarily disagree, though I'm not fond of the idea of having sex with anything that cannot consent.

  • |
  • 2
  • leroyjenkinson said:
    Agreed

    absolutely.

    dr_liam said:
    Hello [name here] I wanna play a little game.... one stays, one goes... cock or balls.... make your choice

    hellpad said:
    You have 30 seconds

    And this is what's going on in Guantanamo Bay Cuba.

  • |
  • -2
  • > lol comments tag

    What in the fuck? Did you guys ban the dude who tagged this tish-show as lol_comments, too?
    Half of them are agreeing ver batum with content AS POSTED. Give me my strike, I will literally brick a pedophile (or dont, either way will prove my point). I'm not even trolling, this is just unexplainable

    A huge oversight in moderation, fully spread-eagle:
    Art saying kill a pedo ver batum / calling a pedo an animal that should be put down: โญ•
    Saying kill a pedo: โŒ

  • |
  • 11
  • kairen said:
    lol humans are interesting when it comes to bonds, don't they darling?
    quite the odd ones, hm? can't understand the two side's gap in misunderstanding tho, hm..

    obvious joke/sarcasm even a child would see through, and laugh hard, and if any of em did something or became traumatized by it at some time in their life, they could politely ask to stop, explaining the situation, and acting as adults, after all, overseers are important to be balanced between good and bad.

    just watch the show, you won't regret the tears of joy, fuuu fu fu fu~~

    Cringy roleplay in the comments!? Ay, yo, we don't do that here!

  • |
  • -1
  • cynical_glitch said:
    ... though I'm not fond of the idea of having sex with anything that cannot consent.

    The Harkness test eh? I agree about that.

    On the other hand non-anthro/feral โ‰  beast because a creature that is not humanoid/anthro shaped can still feature sapience (like talking or having human emotions, something animals can hardly do) like dragons and mythical creatures.

  • |
  • 1
  • tikimillie said:
    You werenโ€™t wrong lol

    Honestly I feel like my comment wouldn't have done much but be a poorly made joke, me getting warned was what caused the shit storm.

  • |
  • 0
  • dirtyratmatt said:
    You have a post defending zoophilia in your favourites.

    Pointing out very real contradictions on what people as a society deem morally right and wrong isn't defending it but go off ig.

    Also if we are going down this route you have personally uploaded over a dozen cub posts and LOTS more feral art so like.. sort out your identity crisis bro. x'D

  • |
  • 5
  • lovenought said:
    If it was reposted now there would be, lol.

    I can understand if it was a repost (to this date I don't know, who knows) but imo if this art piece was a repost I would turn a blind eye anyway cuz that is a message I can agree with. (The message of "Off-ing a pedo" i mean.

    Pedos deserve life sentences, zero parol, and let other inmates take care of those scumbags.

  • |
  • 1
  • lillyfall said:
    Pointing out very real contradictions on what people as a society deem morally right and wrong isn't defending it but go off ig.

    Also if we are going down this route you have personally uploaded over a dozen cub posts and LOTS more feral art so like.. sort out your identity crisis bro. x'D

    And did you bother to look at the date of said posts, let alone the date I joined?

    I haven't uploaded anything with either tags in years now, and any art I had faved with those tags I've pretty much removed for exactly that reason. It's not like you can un-do uploads, but go off I guess.

  • |
  • 0
  • maria_kauffman said:
    People wish to live in an echo chamber. It gets worse everyday.

    True.

    This site got many extreme and legally dubious tags anyway. If people are really against them they're free to never visit the site again because traffic gives money through ads and visibility.

  • |
  • 0
  • ginkei said:
    Why did you get down voted for saying that?

    Even though the image itself isn't real the desire is, and again what is it a image of?

    Have any of you heard of thoughts < actions < habits < behavior.
    Fantasyโ‰ reality is not a good excuse after all, planed murder starts as a fantasy.

    Updated

  • |
  • -3
  • hellpad said:
    Have any of you heard of thoughts < actions < habits < behavior.
    Fantasyโ‰ reality is not a good excuse after all, planed murder starts as a fantasy.

    Mind showing me real evidences from a serious psychological source? Because this sounds like the excuse made by those who wanted to ban violent video-games (or even just video-games period) back in the 90's when Mortal Kombat and Doom were popular (then again in the 00's with GTA).

    By the same logic furry art here should be banned as they're animals (although they're anthropomorphic but still showing animal features).

  • |
  • 6
  • ginkei said:
    Mind showing me real evidences from a serious psychological source? Because this sounds like the excuse made by those who wanted to ban violent video-games (or even just video-games period) back in the 90's when Mortal Kombat and Doom were popular (then again in the 00's with GTA).

    By the same logic furry art here should be banned as they're animals (although they're anthropomorphic but still showing animal features).

    Good point but you don't get a addicting chemical reaction for playing video games like you do watching porn

    And with the furry art yes I do agree that furry porn is very much walking the line but they have adult full grown bodies
    With usually only minor animalistic character such as face hands and tails.

    Edit: again my point is what it is it fantasy of. Should I straight up tell you it's CP? That what it is ,
    It's porn and there is child fictional or not included.

    People wish to live in an echo chamber. It gets worse everyday

    Edit2: Echo chamber? Maybe, but doesn't mean that the points aren't valid. Also you can't really just say things are echo chambers when most people agree on something, it's not like we haven't heard enough from the defenders of this stuff.

    Updated

  • |
  • -5
  • hellpad said:
    Good point but you don't get a addicting chemical reaction for playing video games like you do watching porn.

    Once again I am asking for a serious source about that.

    And with the furry art yes I do agree that furry porn is very much walking the line but they have adult full grown bodies
    With usually only minor animal-like character such as face hands and tails.

    again my point is what it is it fantasy of. Should I straight up tell you it's CP? That what it is: it's porn and there is child (fictional or not included).

    Depends of the author, some like making them anatomically accurate (with a knotted penis for example).

    As for the body what if they got a chibi art style (or being a shortstack)? Short people exist irl (as much as flat chested women but they're still adults nonetheless).

    Then it could be said the same about them being animals (anthropomorphized for sure, but still animal like) because people outside the fandom sees them as such.

    I feel like there is a massive mental gymnastic about what is ok and what isn't.

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • ginkei said:
    Once again I am asking for a serious source about

    https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/porn-addiction#:~:text=Using%20pornography%20may%20also%20activate,the%20addictive%20substance%20or%20behavior

    I feel like there is a massive mental gymnastic about what is ok and what isn't.

    There is but people can generally agree that porn of characters that look like children or are canonical young is not moral.

    Also there aren't anthro irl except for fursuiters obviously, but there are children which are easy to convince and manipulate.

    Ps I will no longer be typing in this comment section.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • hellpad said:
    https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/porn-addiction#:~:text=Using%20pornography%20may%20also%20activate,the%20addictive%20substance%20or%20behavior
    There is but people can generally agree that porn of characters that look like children or are canonical young is not moral.

    Also there aren't anthro irl except for fursuiters obviously, but there are children which are easy to convince and manipulate.

    Ps I will no longer be typing in this comment section.

    Actually, according to a neurological study, visual and audio stimuli (I.E music, movies and video games) and physical stimuli (I.E masterbation) flow along the same nural pathways

    hellpad said:
    https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/porn-addiction#:~:text=Using%20pornography%20may%20also%20activate,the%20addictive%20substance%20or%20behavior
    There is but people can generally agree that porn of characters that look like children or are canonical young is not moral.

    Also there aren't anthro irl except for fursuiters obviously, but there are children which are easy to convince and manipulate.

    Ps I will no longer be typing in this comment section.

    Actually, according to a neurological study, audio and visual stimuli (I.E music, movies and video games) and physical stimuli (I.E masterbation) flow along the same neural pathways. Your brain produces the same chemical response either way. So an addiction to porn and an addiction to something like video games has nothing to really separate one from the other as being more addictive, it's just personal preference in vices.

    In regards to the morality argument, there are many things in fiction that are just as immoral or even MORE immoral than this, that get overlooked. From standard rape play to full on snuff fantasies. But this is the only category where suddenly fiction crosses a line and should not be allowed.

  • |
  • 4
  • carnivore4lyf said:
    Actually, according to a neurological study, visual and audio stimuli (I.E music, movies and video games) and physical stimuli (I.E masterbation) flow along the same nural pathways

    Actually, according to a neurological study, audio and visual stimuli (I.E music, movies and video games) and physical stimuli (I.E masterbation) flow along the same neural pathways. Your brain produces the same chemical response either way. So an addiction to porn and an addiction to something like video games has nothing to really separate one from the other as being more addictive, it's just personal preference in vices.

    In regards to the morality argument, there are many things in fiction that are just as immoral or even MORE immoral than this, that get overlooked. From standard rape play to full on snuff fantasies. But this is the only category where suddenly fiction crosses a line and should not be allowed.

    It's funny how any comment making a strong point like this seems to get downvoated, mine and others. Hitting a little too close to home for someone.

  • |
  • 0
  • larry_or_die said:
    Let's not forget zoophiles. Especially the ones who disguise themselves as furries to make the community look baad.

    Says the one with a dog getting fucked as pfp

  • |
  • -5
  • The fact that this entire comment section is either parroting the post or defending pedophilia really makes me sad.
    Pedophile โ‰  child molester. Pedophilia is a mental disorder, not everyone with an attraction to children acts on that urge and most of them know it's wrong.
    Those with other mental disorders are helped, addictions and prisoners are taken to rehab, how is this any different? Child molesters deserve punishment and rehabilitation like every other abuser.
    This is not an eye for an eye society, and inciting violence against people with a mental disorder isn't funny or helping any cause, it's just empty virtue signaling and further discourages pedophiles from seeking help.
    Here is a Reddit post on the topic that I was in recently. There's some good discussion in there.
    My favorite is "Because itโ€™s completely inconsistent with other leftist views. Imagine being pro-prison reform, truly believing that retributive punishment isnโ€™t justice, and then throwing all that away for specifically pedophiles who you believe should actually be tortured as punishment. Itโ€™s weird, and inconsistent, and shows an abandonment of all logic in favor of purely emotional decision making.
    'I think justice should focus on reform and redemption to the greatest possible extent, and that even murderers should be treated as people rather than subjected to tortuous conditions. Except for pedophiles, letโ€™s break their fucking knees.'
    Itโ€™s stupid on its face."
    Also an article and a large scale study on the destigmatizing of pedophilia as a mental disorder.

  • |
  • 12
  • holmes said:
    > lol comments tag

    What in the fuck? Did you guys ban the dude who tagged this tish-show as lol_comments, too?
    Half of them are agreeing ver batum with content AS POSTED. Give me my strike, I will literally brick a pedophile (or dont, either way will prove my point). I'm not even trolling, this is just unexplainable

    A huge oversight in moderation, fully spread-eagle:
    Art saying kill a pedo ver batum / calling a pedo an animal that should be put down: โญ•
    Saying kill a pedo: โŒ

    I actually put forth the lol_comments tag because this comment section is one of the biggest shitshows I have ever seen on this site.

  • |
  • 6
  • โž–โž–๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ
    โž–๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ
    ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฆ๐ŸŸฆ๐ŸŸฆ
    ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฆ๐ŸŸฆ๐ŸŸฆ
    ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ
    ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ
    โž–๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ
    โž–๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅโž–๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ
    โž–๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅโž–๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ

  • |
  • 6
  • ginkei said:
    Comment section is a landmine.

    By the way, how many people has in their fav cub content?

    Like a world war 1 no mans land war zone.

  • |
  • 2
  • hellpad said:
    https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/porn-addiction#:~:text=Using%20pornography%20may%20also%20activate,the%20addictive%20substance%20or%20behavior
    or are canonical young is not moral.

    Funny how you're invoking canon when porn art is certainly not (unless you consider that it is but that's up to you) and that in a quite funny way some characters existed way before many users here (I mean some are created in the 80-early 90's when the youngest adult user on the site would be born in the early 00's).

  • |
  • 1
  • But how can I find my local pedophile? He recently got arrested and I can't just break into an Oklahoma County jail, I'd be shot on sight.

  • |
  • 2
  • faesari said:
    The fact that this entire comment section is either parroting the post or defending pedophilia really makes me sad.
    Pedophile โ‰  child molester. Pedophilia is a mental disorder, not everyone with an attraction to children acts on that urge and most of them know it's wrong.
    Those with other mental disorders are helped, addictions and prisoners are taken to rehab, how is this any different? Child molesters deserve punishment and rehabilitation like every other abuser.
    This is not an eye for an eye society, and inciting violence against people with a mental disorder isn't funny or helping any cause, it's just empty virtue signaling and further discourages pedophiles from seeking help.
    Here is a Reddit post on the topic that I was in recently. There's some good discussion in there.
    My favorite is "Because itโ€™s completely inconsistent with other leftist views. Imagine being pro-prison reform, truly believing that retributive punishment isnโ€™t justice, and then throwing all that away for specifically pedophiles who you believe should actually be tortured as punishment. Itโ€™s weird, and inconsistent, and shows an abandonment of all logic in favor of purely emotional decision making.
    'I think justice should focus on reform and redemption to the greatest possible extent, and that even murderers should be treated as people rather than subjected to tortuous conditions. Except for pedophiles, letโ€™s break their fucking knees.'
    Itโ€™s stupid on its face."
    Also an article and a large scale study on the destigmatizing of pedophilia as a mental disorder.

    I would think it's because the left always gets called pedos by the right and we've tried so hard to disprove that.
    I don't really think we should have so much sympathy for cold hard serial killer murderers though.we shouldn't just be releasing them back into society with a slap on the wrist either.
    The same would go for rapists, which would include offending pedophiles.
    If you had not included "Pedophile โ‰  child molester", I'd almost think you were defending pedophiles that have offended over the child victims.. They have long lasting mental disorders after getting molested/raped too. Children generally in society have the least power and the smallest voices. They hardly have control over anything they would want to do/not want to do. A lot of people might be misguided but generally, protecting children is by no means bad at all.

    As for abusers in general, I'm sorry that I don't have much sympathy for them either, considering I've seen my father beat up my mother many times, and got hurt myself a few times. The problem with trying to just reform these people is that it invalidates their victims and the impact/consequence of what they did to their victims. Sometimes some of them don't even want to be "reformed" and would go back to their ways when left alone. Sometimes people don't deserve a million chances. Sometimes people don't deserve forgiveness. You abuse the point of an apology if it must be repeated over and over for the same thing.

    Updated

  • |
  • -3
  • faesari said:
    The fact that this entire comment section is either parroting the post or defending pedophilia really makes me sad.
    Pedophile โ‰  child molester. Pedophilia is a mental disorder, not everyone with an attraction to children acts on that urge and most of them know it's wrong.
    Those with other mental disorders are helped, addictions and prisoners are taken to rehab, how is this any different? Child molesters deserve punishment and rehabilitation like every other abuser.
    This is not an eye for an eye society, and inciting violence against people with a mental disorder isn't funny or helping any cause, it's just empty virtue signaling and further discourages pedophiles from seeking help.
    Here is a Reddit post on the topic that I was in recently. There's some good discussion in there.
    My favorite is "Because itโ€™s completely inconsistent with other leftist views. Imagine being pro-prison reform, truly believing that retributive punishment isnโ€™t justice, and then throwing all that away for specifically pedophiles who you believe should actually be tortured as punishment. Itโ€™s weird, and inconsistent, and shows an abandonment of all logic in favor of purely emotional decision making.
    'I think justice should focus on reform and redemption to the greatest possible extent, and that even murderers should be treated as people rather than subjected to tortuous conditions. Except for pedophiles, letโ€™s break their fucking knees.'
    Itโ€™s stupid on its face."
    Also an article and a large scale study on the destigmatizing of pedophilia as a mental disorder.

    ...you have my vote.

  • |
  • 6
  • lonewolf91 said:
    I would think it's because the left always gets called pedos by the right and we've tried so hard to disprove that.
    I don't really think we should have so much sympathy for cold hard serial killer murderers though.we shouldn't just be releasing them back into society with a slap on the wrist either.
    The same would go for rapists, which would include offending pedophiles.
    If you had not included "Pedophile โ‰  child molester", I'd almost think you were defending pedophiles that have offended over the child victims.. They have long lasting mental disorders after getting molested/raped too. Children generally in society have the least power and the smallest voices. They hardly have control over anything they would want to do/not want to do. A lot of people might be misguided but generally, protecting children is by no means bad at all.

    As for abusers in general, I'm sorry that I don't have much sympathy for them either, considering I've seen my father beat up my mother many times, and got hurt myself a few times. The problem with trying to just reform these people is that it invalidates their victims and the impact/consequence of what they did to their victims. Sometimes some of them don't even want to be "reformed" and would go back to their ways when left alone. Sometimes people don't deserve a million chances. Sometimes people don't deserve forgiveness. You abuse the point of an apology if it must be repeated over and over for the same thing.

    There's a difference between sympathy and pity, and there's a difference between validating a victim and everyone following whatever the victim says because of what happened to them.

  • |
  • 1
  • researcher_d1-187 said:
    In this situation, it is.

    >User was banned for this.
    I mean, I get it, no messages telling one to do that, but.. given it's specifically targeted at pedophiles..
    "What did the mods mean by this?"
    Also, relax mods, I'm not accusing you of anything, just a goof.

  • |
  • 1
  • I always like to return here if I want a good laugh. bitWolfy's hissy fit is one of the funniest things I've seen on this website.

  • |
  • 5
  • coolmintyfreshness said:
    I always like to return here if I want a good laugh. bitWolfy's hissy fit is one of the funniest things I've seen on this website.

    once i got mad at someone for saying they wanted rape (because rape is disgusting) and i got a warn from that little shit bitwolfy

  • |
  • -3
  • ginkei said:
    Comment section is a landmine.

    By the way, how many people has in their fav cub content?

    ngl bro kill yourself

    Updated by bitWolfy


    User was banned for the contents of this message.
  • |
  • -7
  • ginkei said:
    True.

    This site got many extreme and legally dubious tags anyway. If people are really against them they're free to never visit the site again because traffic gives money through ads and visibility.

    aight bet, anyways you should still kill yourself, im deleting my account and never visiting this site, or r34, ever again!!! and once again i cant stress this enough, youre an immoral scumbag who deserves to be wiped off the face of the planet, go fucking kill yourself you sad sack of fucking shit

    Updated by bitWolfy


    User was banned for the contents of this message.
  • |
  • -8
  • Isn't being one not a choice and also several people are pedophiles without ever acting upon it? Ya know, being a pedophile doesn't make you a minor rapist/molester. Until the person commits a crime I don't think it should be criminalized and encourage to kill people on that basis, specially due to the fact people have before been linched on the false pretense that they were a pedophile, not even a minor rapist, just the pretense that they were a pedophile.

    Updated by slyroon

  • |
  • 2
  • maria_kauffman said:
    I'm willing to admit I do, fantasy does not equate reality.

    something a pedo would say tbh

    Updated by Cinder


    User received a warning for the contents of this message.
  • |
  • -5
  • faesari said:
    The fact that this entire comment section is either parroting the post or defending pedophilia really makes me sad.
    Pedophile โ‰  child molester. Pedophilia is a mental disorder, not everyone with an attraction to children acts on that urge and most of them know it's wrong.
    Those with other mental disorders are helped, addictions and prisoners are taken to rehab, how is this any different? Child molesters deserve punishment and rehabilitation like every other abuser.
    This is not an eye for an eye society, and inciting violence against people with a mental disorder isn't funny or helping any cause, it's just empty virtue signaling and further discourages pedophiles from seeking help.
    Here is a Reddit post on the topic that I was in recently. There's some good discussion in there.
    My favorite is "Because itโ€™s completely inconsistent with other leftist views. Imagine being pro-prison reform, truly believing that retributive punishment isnโ€™t justice, and then throwing all that away for specifically pedophiles who you believe should actually be tortured as punishment. Itโ€™s weird, and inconsistent, and shows an abandonment of all logic in favor of purely emotional decision making.
    'I think justice should focus on reform and redemption to the greatest possible extent, and that even murderers should be treated as people rather than subjected to tortuous conditions. Except for pedophiles, letโ€™s break their fucking knees.'
    Itโ€™s stupid on its face."
    Also an article and a large scale study on the destigmatizing of pedophilia as a mental disorder.

    Oh boy here comes... time for a wee little rant.

    The general beliefs in regards to the majority of mental disorders are disappointingly undereducated on such subjects. It saddens me to find an entire comment section mostly filled with those too absorbed in hate or those who think it's good to promote what the common belief of pedophelia is. Like god damn, way to leave the world worse for wear.

    There's this little thing often glossed over called intrusive thoughts. Everybody has em, and they ain't necessairily positive. In fact, they rarely are. There's also a few books and movies on this "wonderful" concept called "thought crime." If ya haven't heard of it before, now you have. The point of this is simple.
    Thoughts, when not acted upon, are just thoughts. Unless one acts upon the thoughts they have about murder, they aren't a murderer. Unless one decides to follow through with an intrusive thought, it doesn't leave their mind. Having such thoughts doesn't make you a horrible person. Only acting upon them.

    As for the human brain, things don't always work perfectly and that leads to all sorts of mental disorders. Many have medication and therapy, others don't. I am of the belief that such things as pedophelia should be treated similarily to such things, without the horrible stigma associated with it.

    As for child molesters, ye did say they ain't the same and I agree. At least in my mind, that is the consequence of 0 help and other factors.

    Keep in mind I have not deeply studied this field and my only frame of reference is what i have experience with mental illness and various stuff about thought crime. Am I qualified to teach about this subject? Not really. But research is possible for any interested enough in this. I'm not one of them as I'm way too tired and this incoherent rant was written while I've been high on sleep meds. If I fucked something up, I'll find out in the morning. G'night.

  • |
  • 3
  • thebestdoe said:
    Hot Take: it's still murder to kill someone

    Case in point: Kenshiro from Fist Of The North Star. Kenshiro lives in a post-apocalyptic world, where might makes right and anyone can die. He kills villains in scores, and so is the hero the times need. At the end of the day, Kenshiro is still the ultimate assassin practicing the ultimate assassination art.

  • |
  • 3
  • Weighing in again. If you wanna go to prison for life, so be it. You just spared their life for yours.

  • |
  • -5
  • Granted, yes, but then you are no better than they are by commiting a crime as well.
    but pedophiles are awful either way

  • |
  • 0
  • posting paragraphs makes you the dumb one
    you didnt need to waste time on a virtual comment

  • |
  • 1
  • jerethiahbingleton said:
    Bro died a hero

    Died ban evading, actually. The ban they got for the original comment was 14 days. They created another account 1 day later and got permabanned for evasion.

  • |
  • 0
  • coboltsand said:
    How has this been going on for a year?

    The comment chain will last until the image turns 18 years old, then all the paedophiles will lose interest in it. Duh!

  • |
  • 1