created by scarlanya
Viewing sample resized to 26% of original (view original) Loading...
Children: 1 child (learn more) show »
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • aestheticyn said:
    I don't get how this isn't considered just zoohphilia art. Not hating just wondering when furries will start to realize they're jerking to realistic animal penis.

    Really simple.
    Fury is socially accepted.
    Zoophilic fantasies not.

    Ask someone who is now over fifty. He/She only read Playboy in his/her youth "because of the articles". Same principle.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10
  • aestheticyn said:
    furries will start to realize they're jerking to realistic animal penis.

    I mean.. I don’t.

    To me, this is truly art.

    Also good reference material (artist here), but like Moosifer posted up there.. I too, would hang this bad boy up, walk by it, stop, and be like… “That’s fine Goddamn penis there.”

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • con2art said:
    Really simple.
    Fury is socially accepted.

    No it's not. Go talk to any normal person and they won't even know what a furry is. Your second statement doesn't even make any sense. How does old people who read playboy have anything to do with taboos?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • notanazi said:
    I mean.. I don’t.

    To me, this is truly art.

    This isn't a good argument. Just because it's "just art" doesn't take away from its subject matter being of a really well drawn realistic horse penis.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -8
  • aestheticyn said:
    No it's not. Go talk to any normal person and they won't even know what a furry is. Your second statement doesn't even make any sense. How does old people who read playboy have anything to do with taboos?

    Just because not everyone knows or does it doesn't mean it's not accepted. You won't find anything that everyone does. There are fury fairs and conventions, there are official organizers. Completely without demonstrations or trying to lock people up. And those who say they do Fury are not shunned because of it. Not even in Texas.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • aestheticyn said:
    No it's not. Go talk to any normal person and they won't even know what a furry is. Your second statement doesn't even make any sense. How does old people who read playboy have anything to do with taboos?

    You're obviously too young to understand. But there was a time when you lost your reputation if you looked at the pictures in that Playboy magazine. So people had to say, "I bought these because of the article. Here, quite interesting research on flowers for the kitchen table."

    Yeah, today that's not a problem. But ask someone a little older.

    And it's the same with this topic here:
    Say: "I'm into horse penises. Stallions are really attractively endowed." You'll be lucky if you don't get called sick.
    But say "Hey, that's Fury. People who look a little bit like animals." Then they'll have a convention for that.

    Just read from an artist, "Don't draw ferals. Minimum human intelligence required." Has drawings of Spirit in his account.
    It's about how to promote and sell it so you don't get hostility.

    And there we are with the taboos. And how people used to justify buying Playboy.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • aestheticyn said:
    I don't get how this isn't considered just zoohphilia art. Not hating just wondering when furries will start to realize they're jerking to realistic animal penis.

    Your PFP is cub rape.
    Shut.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1