You can not view this image.

This post was deleted or flagged for the following reasons:

  • [DELETION] Irrelevant to site - NotMeNotYou -
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • This is not furry, it is more towards real animals and humans, which isn't furry. That alone, not mentioning the snuff animal torture shit, should be enough to delete this.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • MerK said:
    This is not furry, it is more towards real animals and humans, which isn't furry. That alone, not mentioning the snuff animal torture shit, should be enough to delete this.

    Agree'd. I want this off.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • Horrific, yes. Sadistic? Well, that depends on your opinion of hunters or (in the other case) the meat industry. Torture and snuff? Christ, I hope not.

    Deleted mine per request; yep, that was a followup in shitty taste and I apologise. e621: it should be for sportsmen, -by- sportsmen; not like /b/.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • I think this is made for when the animal is dead so it isn't torture, but I think its just easier and better to gut it the normal way so the blood doesn't mess up the meat.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • How many of you actually hunt? This is a tool used to remove the anus and intestinal tract of a harvested animal. While I also do not agree with the presence of the picture on this site, it is far from torture or sadism.

    Granted, I prefer cutting the whole genital area out at once rather than simply removing the butt'ole.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • I'm kinda wondering what this pic is doing here. I mean, saying it's relevant is kind of a stretch. Posted by a mod though, so meh.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Inappropriate to the site -- not furry, not art, not likely to appeal to the site's users. Its poster should have the grace to delete it again.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Kjorteo - this is from the Terms of Service;

    "You will make a best faith effort to upload only high quality furry-related images."

    But yeah I get your point. It's really annoying when people want to stay on topic.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • MerK said:
    Kjorteo - this is from the Terms of Service;

    "You will make a best faith effort to upload only high quality furry-related images."

    Well, shit. Over half the site needs to be purged then!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • deadjackal said:
    Well, shit. Over half the site needs to be purged then!

    Gotta start somewhere then.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • MerK said:
    Kjorteo - this is from the Terms of Service;

    "You will make a best faith effort to upload only high quality furry-related images."

    Since when did that come into play? Arc has stated more than once that e621 is not a furry specific site.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • MerK said:
    Kjorteo - this is from the Terms of Service;

    "You will make a best faith effort to upload only high quality furry-related images."

    But yeah I get your point. It's really annoying when people want to stay on topic.

    That is an error on our part. This is a site for anthropomorphic images in addition to furry images. While I can agree that this picture is off-topic, I would also kindly ask you to not clog our comment system with complaints about pictures not being "furry".

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Okay... Although, this isn't anthropomorphic. It's a drawn animal. Just a hind part of one though, but considering the rest of the image, it's not hard to figure out that it is just an animal, meaning NOT anthropomorphic.

    And I hardly think commenting on two pictures could be defined as "clogging". With all respect, if this site is going to allow images like these (that aren't anthro, nor furry, and are simply provocative), I know that I'm not alone in not coming back here.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • MerK said:
    Okay... Although, this isn't anthropomorphic. It's a drawn animal. Just a hind part of one though, but considering the rest of the image, it's not hard to figure out that it is just an animal, meaning NOT anthropomorphic.

    And I hardly think commenting on two pictures could be defined as "clogging". With all respect, if this site is going to allow images like these (that aren't anthro, nor furry, and are simply provocative), I know that I'm not alone in not coming back here.

    If one picture is going to keep you from coming back, more power to you. The internet isn't for everyone.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Jesus H. Christ you nancy crybabies, don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.

    Seriously - this - THIS, of all images on the site, is the one that makes people get pissy and start drama and whining?

    No, wait, scratch that, the fact someone has actually threatened to leave the site in a huff because they're seeing a schematic of some hunting equipment, on a site filled with bestiality, cub, vore, rape, scat, and WORSE, is possibly the most pathetic thing I've seen in a long time. Good riddance.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • deadjackal said:
    Dare I say it? It's almost like being on the Fur Affinity forums :-P

    For some added hilarity, total contributions to the site for Mr. 'Threatening to leave the site forever you will be sorry I am gone!':
    0 Posts
    0 Favourites
    0 Tag Corrections
    10 Comments
    1 Deletion Request

    FANTASTIC.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • mellis said:
    For some added hilarity, total contributions to the site for Mr. 'Threatening to leave the site forever you will be sorry I am gone!':
    0 Posts
    0 Favourites
    0 Tag Corrections
    10 Comments
    1 Deletion Request

    FANTASTIC.

    Ah, so we're not losing anything of value then, lol.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • stfu and post more porn, all of you. if i see one more post here on this obvious troll post, i am taking your internet privileges away.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Not to sound rude, mainly because I appreciate this site, but the whole "I would also kindly ask you to not clog our comment system with complaints about pictures not being 'furry' " rings a little hollow when you think that images like this are pretty much clogging up servers.

    But hey, you guys pay for the servers, so if you want to keep stuff like this, knock yourself out. Just get ready to deal with more images and bitching as you get more things that could be seen as being.. questionable at least, objectionable at most.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • It helps me if you picture the sound effect that goes with image # 1 and 2

    *swuirckkssshhhh*

    Seriously, you look at child rape and think this is bad LAWL

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • There's furry art of a deer ass in the picture. It counts. So what if it's getting its bowels ripped out. Unpleasant? Sure. Compared to some of the other unpleasant pics on this site? Sorry. The removal argument doesn't hold water.

    I came.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Sakkano said:
    Not to sound rude, mainly because I appreciate this site, but the whole "I would also kindly ask you to not clog our comment system with complaints about pictures not being 'furry' " rings a little hollow when you think that images like this are pretty much clogging up servers.

    Comment was less about bandwidth and server space and more about being a whiny retard.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • malamute said:
    There's furry art of a deer ass in the picture. It counts. So what if it's getting its bowels ripped out. Unpleasant? Sure. Compared to some of the other unpleasant pics on this site? Sorry. The removal argument doesn't hold water.

    I came.

    The tiny difference might be, that those pictures are purely fictional. None of that really happened. Of course I´m aware that rape and abuse are real, but I think nobody, artists and consumers alike, would do that for real.

    This thing we have here is real. People buy it and use it. You can´t say to yourself that this ist fiction, while watching it. It confronts with an unpleasant reality, something most of us simply don´t want to think of, while browsing for erotic pictures. That´s what makes this worse than those pictures, you refer to.

    And one last thing. I thought this site was about sharing pictures with others. Pictures that those other people like to watch. If this here makes viewers unhappy, I think it shouldn´t be here.

    So I think it would be best if you accept that others simply don´t like this picture.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • Hmm. I have to agree to some degree with Silber on this one.

    People, seriously. this isn't about furry/nonfurry, it's not about being a whiny little bastard, or 'OMG, you're so leet, you pissed off some little kid on the internets'.

    Honestly, anyone who doesn't see this post and say 'Gee, someone posted this HIGHLY CONTROVERSIAL picture here to make fun of a bunch of people who have a real opinion, but are going too far' has something to learn.

    And the really crappy part? For every ONE person who's whiny and doesn't really leave, how many genuinely cool people just say to themselves 'Wow, that's actually not cool, I don't think I'll bother coming here again', and don't say a word about it? That's people who might post, or who might be an addition to the community here.

    Trolling sucks guys. Yes it's part of being on the internet, but why feed it? Seriously, who gets a boner off a line-picture from an instruction manual.... *cue comments from b-tards getting off on said picture* ...and is it really that common that this could NOT be considered obvious baiting? Mods, no offense, but use a little sense and delete inflammatory material. This is kinda over the line.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • If this post can go two hours without being flagged for deletion on the grounds of being "not furry" I will delete it.

    :]

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • If this image is OBVIOUS BAITING then why are you falling for it?

    I don't want this to turn into some kind of place where every little thing that irks someone gets people screaming for it to be deleted.

    Exercise a little personal responsibility and don't look at it. Put the disembowelment tag in your blacklist, even!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • If someone leaves this site because they are offended about an offensive image (let alone a freaking piece of hunting equipment used to clean a cadaver), given how easy it is to block images/blacklist tags, they were probably whiny overreactive dramabombs waiting to happen anyways.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Koekje said:
    If this post can go two hours without being flagged for deletion on the grounds of being "not furry" I will delete it.

    :]

    What really makes me sad here, is that you´d rather let the fight go on, than ending it quick an peacefully.

    Nobody seems to bring forward the argument that he wants this picture to stay because he likes it. All I see here is constant attacking of people who don´t like it. And, so it seems to me, for the only reason of to attack people. Lame.

    Does anyone have a real aesthetic reason to keep it? If not I think you should perform your duty and delete it. Not for beeing not furry, but for having some piece here again. Please.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Koekje said:
    If this post can go two hours without being flagged for deletion on the grounds of being "not furry" I will delete it.

    :]

    So you won't do anything as long as people ask you to enforce your own rules using the tools provided by you. That makes sense.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • This is a great time to realise that graphic and unpleasant things such as this were part of what brought our modern world to bear, so that we could exist in such a cute and cuddly society. Also, I've never seen anything with -36+ votes before, another reason the image should stay.

    Though because of the large number of furs on this site who are unhappy with the administration's management protocols, I've decided to start my own server. You can visit this new site at http://www.CastleofAaaauuuggghhhh

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Again, let me state. e621 is not some fluffy, lovey-dovey everything is happy site.

    Some things here may offend you. However, we expect users to be mature enough to be able to COPE with it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • This is the best comment list EVER. Not a lot of comments on stuff but this one surely takes the cake! Seriously add it to your black list and stop looking at it unless like me you enjoy reading people baww.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Everyone knocking this thing has never used one.

    It makes cleaning the deer SO much easier. Sometimes you even get this hilarious *pop* noise. I love it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Heh, yeah I agree, this thread is a bit hilarious. "Whining" is a big no-no apparently, but trolling and provoking? Then you get a pat on the back.

    It's also a great example when people won't even respect their own site. If you have rules, then enforce them. If someone tries to help you with that using reporting tools that YOU provide, then why would you spit back in their faces? Disrespectful, not only to the users who wants to see a site that holds a certain quality, but to yourself, simply put.

    I don't care about the image much anymore, I'm just deeply fascinated in the mob mentality. Sure, it's your site, whoever owns it, but don't expect respect from your users if you don't care about your own rules.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Interesting, the attacks go on, but still no serious reason to keep this picture, safe for "I like it, because it pisses other people off and thats fun".

    And it does. It pisses people off. It pisses a lot of people off, 48 so far to be precise. And so far, I don´t see a single person here, who likes this picture for aesthetical reasons. That should tell you something and I think, whoever has the power to act should do it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • MerK said:
    Heh, yeah I agree, this thread is a bit hilarious. "Whining" is a big no-no apparently, but trolling and provoking? Then you get a pat on the back.

    It's also a great example when people won't even respect their own site. If you have rules, then enforce them. If someone tries to help you with that using reporting tools that YOU provide, then why would you spit back in their faces? Disrespectful, not only to the users who wants to see a site that holds a certain quality, but to yourself, simply put.

    I don't care about the image much anymore, I'm just deeply fascinated in the mob mentality. Sure, it's your site, whoever owns it, but don't expect respect from your users if you don't care about your own rules.

    Look pal, the site is hosted at Outback Steakhouse, No Rules, Just Right is the motto, and you are on thin ice with the Aussies.

    I am addicted to this post. Thanks msc!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • ... ... wow, am I the only person who thought "Wow, that's a strange device, seems to be used for something involving hunting, most likely in prepping a caracas." and moved on. People on both sides of this fight are getting too fussy in my tastes, how many "Unknown artist" tags and blank artist urls could have been filled in from the effort put into this 'debate'?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • now you fucked up. now you fucked up. now you have fucked up.

    all of you. your internet privileges will be ceased immediately. i warned you. scroll up. internet, gone. im deleting it asap. not this picture but the internet. your internet. although i saw more posts then usual therefor i shall take a moment to consider not deleting it. should it be gone in the morning (your internet), you know why. (so stfu go back to posting moar.(Again!))

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • "I think, whoever has the power to act should do it. "

    ENGAGING POWER TO ACT -
    Anyone who complains about this image or that our site policy sucks because it isn't IN LINE WITH YOUR RETARDED CRYBABY DEMANDS, after this line, gets a ban because they need to get a life:
    ------------------------------------------------------------

    (p.s. a mod posted the image)
    (p.p.s. I weep for humanity, you fuckwits have apparently lost all objective perspective for anything that actually matters, vs. this)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Actually, completely irrelevant to the butthurt (HA!) whiner-fest above, I couldn't help but notice that, right at this moment, the tag "Deer" has 223 matches. The .223 is hardly adequate for deer, though.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • How about all of you shut the fuck up about it? You are all acting like a bunch of kids over something so small and stupid. You drama queens haven't made the fandom better by the drama laden shit that exits your mouths.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Guys, its for after the hunt when you have to gut the deer. This isnt a way to do it. You gotta cut it at the anus and slice up the belly to get everything out. Its awesome. Smells terrible, but awesome.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap YOUR TEARS ARE DELICIOUS

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Silberwolf said:
    The tiny difference might be, that those pictures are purely fictional. None of that really happened. Of course I´m aware that rape and abuse are real, but I think nobody, artists and consumers alike, would do that for real.

    Dude, you have way too much faith in humankind.

    TheListener said:
    ... ... wow, am I the only person who thought "Wow, that's a strange device, seems to be used for something involving hunting, most likely in prepping a caracas." and moved on. People on both sides of this fight are getting too fussy in my tastes, how many "Unknown artist" tags and blank artist urls could have been filled in from the effort put into this 'debate'?

    When I saw this the first time I thought "that look paifull... wait how did I even get to this pic?" then I moved on. But I just realized about 15 minutes ago how many comments are posted here. It's fun to read them xD

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Oh my deer lord. I think I need to get one of these. I can think of a number of people who need this done to them.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • That's much better. An Remington 870 is much better for hunting deer than is a .223, just as long as you don't have any long shots.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • MerK said:
    This is not furry, it is more towards real animals and humans, which isn't furry. That alone, not mentioning the snuff animal torture shit, should be enough to delete this.

    It's not snuff or animal torture. Just a tool to remove the bowel 1st with contaminating the meat.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Personally, I learded something from this. 1st: humanity sucks. 2nd: tho not with this tool, ppl have been doing this for thousands of years. Are we so out of touch from where we came from that this bothers ppl? Answer- yes. And finally: hunting rocks

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • revons said:
    I think this is made for when the animal is dead so it isn't torture, but I think its just easier and better to gut it the normal way so the blood doesn't mess up the meat.

    Dude, blood? Messing up meat? There is blood IN the meat already.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • DSJesterXII said:
    Dude, blood? Messing up meat? There is blood IN the meat already.

    Don't you know anything about meat preparation before it hits the stores? After the animal is killed, its cut open and hung upside-down to let the blood run out. Too much blood makes the meat spoil and rot faster. So while yes there is blood in the container when you pick it up from the store, its still significantly less than if they hadn't bled it out.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • My God, 4 years ago this was posted, and people were still arging about it up until 7 months ago. Dayumn... that must be a lot of butthurt deer furries arguing against this pic.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • im sure this was posted just to get a rise out of someone, especially those who dont know what the tool is properly used for. because its the internet :D

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0