lol

That horse is awfully blue.

That chicken is much too fluffy and cute.

How is this explicit?

Ray_Clocks said:
How is this explicit?

He's got a sheath. Sheaths are explicit.

SnowWolf said:
He's got a sheath. Sheaths are explicit.

I'll be sure to tell everyone to dress their horses, else it's pornographic...

CandleJake said:
I'll be sure to tell everyone to dress their horses, else it's pornographic...

I get what you're saying, "oh no, a sheath! The Horror! THE HORROR!" ... and it honestly bugs me a bit to have a anatomically correct feral tagged explicit-- but I can understand it. where's the line between, say, this image and post #1407268 or post #1315102 ? It's easy for you or I to draw a line in our brain between a 'tasteful' nude and and an explicit one... but is that line where everyone else would draw it?

It's "easiest" to say that anything with those sexy bits are explicit. Even when they're in no way a focus, and are an animal being drawn realistically.

Sheaths are allowed on sites like DA though but for the most part, as in most paintings and general photographs that are not a focus and tend to be simply a bump where the belly ends and the leg begins. I can understand the need to err on the side of caution though.