You must be logged in to view this image. (learn more)

Parent: post #6268 (deleted) that has 9 siblings (learn more) show »
Children: 3 children (learn more) show »
Blacklisted
(help)
  • Comments
    •

    supermarcopolo

    Member

    Why would anyone so be so inspired by this that they commission someone so they can come back for seconds?

    Rule 103: there will always be a pony version of it,no matter what.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •

    DelurC

    Blocked

    Waffleking said:
    Oh hey, a new cheese grater image. Wonder how many downvotes this ones gonna get compared to the other.

    Less, it doesn't look as gory.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •

    user 153907

    Member

    I think the major difference between this and the old one is that the subject here dosen't appear to be in nearly as much pain if any.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
    •

    BlueDingo

    Member

    You push the cheesegrater in.
    You pull the cheesegrater out.
    You push the cheesegrater in.
    And you twist it all about.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
    •

    garr890354839

    Member

    BlueDingo said:
    You push the cheesegrater in.
    You pull the cheesegrater out.
    You push the cheesegrater in.
    And you twist it all about.

    Just no. I even hear the flipping tune to the mothertrucking song. I will now take an hour to get that song and these lyrics out of my head.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •

    Daneasaur

    Member

    How amusing that this is all that's left; a genetic offshoot of the legendary post.

    Artists who pull multi site gallery purges will never get my approval.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
    •

    devonm0

    Member

    rhyolite said:
    Has anyone drawn someone putting a furry in an anthro cheesgrater?
    "Cheesgrater, now it's payback."

    Wouldn't that be like throwing someone into a wood chipper or meat grinder, though? I mean, the anthro cheese grater would be contracting and relaxing its orifice in pleasure, and all the while the blades inside the orifice would be tearing the living sex toy to shreds as the pulsing of the grater's muscles would not only be constricting and relaxing around the fur, but also pulling them deeper inside as the hole constricting, dragging said fur along the blades as they drew in from all around. So really, the grater gets its blood sacrifice whether an object or the next objectiphile's creation, and the fur looses either way.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •

    devonm0

    Member

    Like another commenter said, at least Rumble looks like he's enjoying it. And isn't the image tagged 'masochism'? It's tagged 'rape', too, but is it really? Rumble's a pegasus who, despite being barely a colt (as compared to a foal or baby pony) is a good enough flier that he has the attention of his professional stunt flier older brother's attention. There are no restraints in play, and part of being a good flier in the show is being able to right oneself. There are tears streaming down his eyes, but of course there are. Being a masochist doesn't magically change the sensation of pain into pleasure. Pain is still pain, but to a masochist pain sets off whatever it is in the brain of fetishists that brings them immense satisfaction from embracing their kinks, a feeling I've heard completely outshines even the pleasure of an orgasm. So yes, he has tears running down his face, but he's not crying. He's also not in any obvious distress besides automatic reactions. His eyes are open, he's watching Anon tear his asshole to shit from the inside, yeah his nose is a little scrunched up, but his mouth is open and his tongue out licking up his own cum.

    Rumble is a minor, but I believe the rape tag in images with underage characters in sexual situations relies on the assumption that, while kids they know enough to give a properly informed consent. That being said, I can't see any sign of distress in Rumble's expression or posture, so regardless of what the artist may or may not have said about this image, I'm not sure there's any indication of rape to be seen here, so I'm removing it and the 'forced' tag since they're one and the same in this situation. If anyone puts them back in that's fine, I'm just stating and acting upon my opinion. As is said in the wiki page of the 'forced' tag, in a static image it's hard to tell the intent of the one inflicting whatever. That's why I always go by the recipient.

    Off topic, but I also removed 'earth pony' from the species tags for this image, because while it's clear that the artist didn't draw an alternate, unicorn Rumble, no further information can be determined about his race because we can't see his back. If he's a pegasus, his wings are folded, which if that's the case is another point against the idea of him being in distress. Winged animals have an instinct that makes them flare their wings out if they feel threatened, in danger, or distressed. At first it'd be a means of trying to scare the source of the feeling off by appearing larger than they are. This way they're also poised for take off at a moment's notice in case things continue to go south. Anon wouldn't have caught Rumble if he is a pegasus here, but I'm not tagging this image as containing a pegasus pony because there are no wings to be seen.

    At the same time, I feel like tagging this as earth pony when we can't see if Rumble has wings or not isn't following the 'tag what you see' rule very well. It is to an extent, but shouldn't it also be based on information we can't get from the perspective? At the very least, if it's to be tagged 'earth pony' according to 'tag what you see', then it shouldn't be tagged Rumble. Example, I only tagged it 'Anon' because I recognized him as a human from the fact that he's bipedal with hands and feet in an image with a feral pony, and his skin is green. The design of Anon is distinctive enough with the green skin that I don't need to see his lack of a face to know he's Anon. Rumble, on the other hand has a simple enough color palette to him that the only way you can say you see Rumble is if you either can see, or assume he's a pegasus pony.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
    •

    devonm0

    Member

    I see that face on Rumble in this situation, and all I can think is he's about to start begging Anon to either 'stick it in deeper this time' or 'grate my goddamn colon already'. Yeah, he doesn't look distressed by this. He looks like he's wondering when Anon will 'stop making that squeamish face, I know you're enjoying this as much as I am, and just hurt this fucking slut some more'.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
    •

    -Tomato-

    Blocked

    devonm0 said:
    Like another commenter said, at least Rumble looks like he's enjoying it. And isn't the image tagged 'masochism'? It's tagged 'rape', too, but is it really? Rumble's a pegasus who, despite being barely a colt (as compared to a foal or baby pony) is a good enough flier that he has the attention of his professional stunt flier older brother's attention. There are no restraints in play, and part of being a good flier in the show is being able to right oneself. There are tears streaming down his eyes, but of course there are. Being a masochist doesn't magically change the sensation of pain into pleasure. Pain is still pain, but to a masochist pain sets off whatever it is in the brain of fetishists that brings them immense satisfaction from embracing their kinks, a feeling I've heard completely outshines even the pleasure of an orgasm. So yes, he has tears running down his face, but he's not crying. He's also not in any obvious distress besides automatic reactions. His eyes are open, he's watching Anon tear his asshole to shit from the inside, yeah his nose is a little scrunched up, but his mouth is open and his tongue out licking up his own cum.

    Rumble is a minor, but I believe the rape tag in images with underage characters in sexual situations relies on the assumption that, while kids they know enough to give a properly informed consent. That being said, I can't see any sign of distress in Rumble's expression or posture, so regardless of what the artist may or may not have said about this image, I'm not sure there's any indication of rape to be seen here, so I'm removing it and the 'forced' tag since they're one and the same in this situation. If anyone puts them back in that's fine, I'm just stating and acting upon my opinion. As is said in the wiki page of the 'forced' tag, in a static image it's hard to tell the intent of the one inflicting whatever. That's why I always go by the recipient.

    Off topic, but I also removed 'earth pony' from the species tags for this image, because while it's clear that the artist didn't draw an alternate, unicorn Rumble, no further information can be determined about his race because we can't see his back. If he's a pegasus, his wings are folded, which if that's the case is another point against the idea of him being in distress. Winged animals have an instinct that makes them flare their wings out if they feel threatened, in danger, or distressed. At first it'd be a means of trying to scare the source of the feeling off by appearing larger than they are. This way they're also poised for take off at a moment's notice in case things continue to go south. Anon wouldn't have caught Rumble if he is a pegasus here, but I'm not tagging this image as containing a pegasus pony because there are no wings to be seen.

    At the same time, I feel like tagging this as earth pony when we can't see if Rumble has wings or not isn't following the 'tag what you see' rule very well. It is to an extent, but shouldn't it also be based on information we can't get from the perspective? At the very least, if it's to be tagged 'earth pony' according to 'tag what you see', then it shouldn't be tagged Rumble. Example, I only tagged it 'Anon' because I recognized him as a human from the fact that he's bipedal with hands and feet in an image with a feral pony, and his skin is green. The design of Anon is distinctive enough with the green skin that I don't need to see his lack of a face to know he's Anon. Rumble, on the other hand has a simple enough color palette to him that the only way you can say you see Rumble is if you either can see, or assume he's a pegasus pony.

    Mucho texto.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
    •

    garr890354839

    Member

    majamystic256 said:
    we need more cheesegrater furry pictures, this is a quality meme.

    Raccoon with cheese-grated anus, news at 5.
    Also, a Zoroark found dead in a basement with cheese grater dildo inserted into its privates.
    And now cheese grater psycho strikes again on a pony the size of a domestic cat.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •

    user 1312156

    Member

    daneasaur said:
    How amusing that this is all that's left; a genetic offshoot of the legendary post.

    Artists who pull multi site gallery purges will never get my approval.

    There's a Deep Web version of e621 that doesn't delete any posts at all - that's my rudimentary knowledge of how it works.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
    •