Loving that tooth cross section

I always wonder how this character was supposed to be part dunkleosteus, but this explains it

Wow she has some chompers on her.

Love all the details

Hell yeah, this is awesome :D

Autumn-Ferret said:
I always wonder how this character was supposed to be part dunkleosteus, but this explains it

Those were the more obvious traits. The hybridization is also my explanation for the non otter traits like the fuzzy white inner ear thing, lack of webbing between the fingers, and lack of mams. Although one thing doesn't explicitly lead to the other this is the internal reasoning as to why she is only kind of an otter.

As an artist myself, I greatly admire that full jaw shot

can someone explain to me why this is tagged as cuntboy? First its bin proven by the author and 2, it sais her in the picture. Why are the tags locked? this could prevent someone who has the tag blocked from not seeing this when its tagged incorrectly. sorry for the ramble just needed to vent for a few...

tsampikos said:
Those were the more obvious traits. The hybridization is also my explanation for the non otter traits like the fuzzy white inner ear thing, lack of webbing between the fingers, and lack of mams. Although one thing doesn't explicitly lead to the other this is the internal reasoning as to why she is only kind of an otter.

The creator says this is a Female.

Stars12 said:
can someone explain to me why this is tagged as cuntboy? First its bin proven by the author and 2, it sais her in the picture. Why are the tags locked? this could prevent someone who has the tag blocked from not seeing this when its tagged incorrectly. sorry for the ramble just needed to vent for a few...

Yeah, I dont get this site sometimes. Meanwhile this;

post #717610

Is locked to flat-chested female

She's a Devonian fish/otter...?

Stars12 said:
can someone explain to me why this is tagged as cuntboy?

Stubbornness. Even if we go by "Tag What You See", this picture clearly depicts a flat-chested female with very wide, feminine hips. The term "androgynous" exists for a reason, but I guess everything needs to be intersex.

If you would... please sell Dakimakuras of her... I would immediately purchase one.

Hurr_Durr said:
Stubbornness. Even if we go by "Tag What You See", this picture clearly depicts a flat-chested female with very wide, feminine hips. The term "androgynous" exists for a reason, but I guess everything needs to be intersex.

Even if you go strictly by "tag what you see", what I see in the image's text is a direct reference to the fact that Mik is female and not a cuntboy. Not only is her anatomy female, but the image itself confirms a female tag. This site's tagging policies are really failing if someone can search for things and not find them.

Whatsapokemon said:
This site's tagging policies are really failing if someone can search for things and not find them.

I think the policies as written are fine, but certain admins are blatantly violating them with this character.

In this pic for instance, her body is very feminine, with very wide hips. But apparently they've decided that flat chest + short hair = cuntboy, no matter what the gender-tagging flowcharts say.

For other images where she's drawn with less feminine hips, it's understandable, but there's no denying that this pic depicts a feminine body.

If they insist on tagging flat-chested, wide-hipped tomboys as "cuntboys", then fine. But specifically blocking people from adding the tags for "female" or "flat-chested" is just ridiculous. Those tags clearly apply here.

It really seems to me like it's not motivated by a desire to tag the images correctly, but just because someone has a fixation on labeling this character a cuntboy.

Ratte said:
There's a difference between a flat chest and defined pectorals, hence why this is still a cuntboy and not a female for our tagging purposes. Please read the gender tagging wiki entry.

Pectorals are not mentioned at all in the gender tagging entry.

Besides, women still have pectoral muscles under their breasts. A flat chest and a bit of muscle and the pecs can be defined.

Asriel-Akita said:
Yeah, I dont get this site sometimes. Meanwhile this;

post #717610

Is locked to flat-chested female

Mik is far more feminine than this FTM who is too feminine for the cuntboy tag. Can't have it both ways, e621.

Hurr_Durr said:
Stubbornness. Even if we go by "Tag What You See", this picture clearly depicts a flat-chested female with very wide, feminine hips. The term "androgynous" exists for a reason, but I guess everything needs to be intersex.

The TWYS policy could stand to be a lot less anal, if not revised considerably (IMHO a "facts-first, then tag what you see when unknown or ambiguous" policy is better) to stop this crap. Also, more discourse before deletions as I've had some really horrible experiences of shit being deleted that shouldn't have been, without any discourse from the mods. It has left me sour, and borderline hating this site in it's entirety.

Am I the only one more annoyed that this thing dominates the "dunkleosteus" tag on what amounts to a thin technicality? Moreso than anything to do with androgyny.

I want armoured nightmare fish, not waif otters.

Kauske said:
Am I the only one more annoyed that this thing dominates the "dunkleosteus" tag on what amounts to a thin technicality? Moreso than anything to do with androgyny.

I want armoured nightmare fish, not waif otters.

I guess that can be annoying, but searching for the species you want with "-hybrid" might help. Though, then that also blocks any images with a regular dunkleosteus and a separate hybrid, if there are any.

Hurr_Durr said:
Stubbornness. Even if we go by "Tag What You See", this picture clearly depicts a flat-chested female with very wide, feminine hips. The term "androgynous" exists for a reason, but I guess everything needs to be intersex.

This very same image is elsewhere on the site, twice over, and is properly labeled as female. This is just the last holdout of a mod who won't admit when they're personally wrong.