You must be logged in to view this image. (learn more)

Description

[PAGE 15]

"Around a year and a half ago I colored Black Kitten‘s comic Monday Mornings.
Then a while ago Black-Kitten started releasing pages of Tuesday Mornings, so (of course) I began coloring them as well as he releases them.
However, my style has evolved since I originally colored Monday Mornings, and I wanted to see the original comic in my new style. This was the results."
- Owlalope

Lines: https://www.furaffinity.net/user/black-kitten
Colors: https://www.furaffinity.net/user/owlalope

If you want to see pages of Tuesday Mornings faster, please donate to Black-Kitten

Also, if you want to see my colored pages of it so far, or want to watch me work on it and other arts, follow me on Picarto: https://picarto.tv/Owlalope

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • neo4812 said:
    good job, enjoy that retard baby

    dracotay said:
    Mutant babies incoming.

    Actually from what I heard genetic defects aren't likely to happen in the first generation, but for each consecutive generation the odds of genetic defects increase, so if they had kids they would probably be fine, but if their kids then had kids with each other that would be a problem.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 102
  • bakeneko said:
    Actually from what I heard genetic defects aren't likely to happen in the first generation, but for each consecutive generation the odds of genetic defects increase, so if they had kids they would probably be fine, but if their kids then had kids with each other that would be a problem.

    Good.... to know.... O_O

  • Reply
  • |
  • 62
  • bakeneko said:
    Actually from what I heard genetic defects aren't likely to happen in the first generation, but for each consecutive generation the odds of genetic defects increase, so if they had kids they would probably be fine, but if their kids then had kids with each other that would be a problem.

    THANK YOU! I'M OFF TO FUCK MY COUSIN!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 132
  • bakeneko said:
    Actually from what I heard genetic defects aren't likely to happen in the first generation, but for each consecutive generation the odds of genetic defects increase, so if they had kids they would probably be fine, but if their kids then had kids with each other that would be a problem.

    Agreed, homozygosity intensity gets worse as the same genetics are overlapped over and over.
    A link I found helpful
    (I really don't know what I just said)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10
  • Acolyte said:
    THANK YOU! I'M OFF TO FUCK MY COUSIN!

    Funny thing about that, I also heard that technically it's possible to have a child with your 3rd or more distant cousin without any risk of genetic defect as the genetic relation at that point is thin enough for that not to be an issue, or something to that effect.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 14
  • @All What are you all talking about? Do you not see that she can't have children? Her vagina leads to the void of space.
    Yes I know about the whole dilemma about the pregnancy and whatnot since it's very well possible but still he put a space layout on the negative space left over.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 22
  • Routganan said:
    @All What are you all talking about? Do you not see that she can't have children? Her vagina leads to the void of space.
    Yes I know about the whole dilemma about the pregnancy and whatnot since it's very well possible but still he put a space layout on the negative space left over.

    Astronaut children

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • neo4812 said:
    good job, enjoy that retard baby

    bakeneko said:
    Actually from what I heard genetic defects aren't likely to happen in the first generation, but for each consecutive generation the odds of genetic defects increase, so if they had kids they would probably be fine, but if their kids then had kids with each other that would be a problem.

    ThisIsAnUniqueName said:
    Agreed, homozygosity intensity gets worse as the same genetics are overlapped over and over.
    A link I found helpful
    (I really don't know what I just said)

    bakeneko said:
    Funny thing about that, I also heard that technically it's possible to have a child with your 3rd or more distant cousin without any risk of genetic defect as the genetic relation at that point is thin enough for that not to be an issue, or something to that effect.

    e621 comment section, where erections go to die.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 26
  • Genjar

    Former Staff

    bakeneko said:
    Funny thing about that, I also heard that technically it's possible to have a child with your 3rd or more distant cousin without any risk of genetic defect

    There's always a risk, regardless of the relations. Genetic defects are common in humans. Pair off any two random strangers, and it's likely that some defects will be passed on.

    Having a child with your second cousin is pretty much as risky as having one with some random person from your hometown. Because you almost certainly have too many common ancestors. ...which is why inbreeding tends to be a major problem in small xenophobic communities. Everyone's closely related, even if they don't realize it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • bakeneko said:
    Actually from what I heard genetic defects aren't likely to happen in the first generation, but for each consecutive generation the odds of genetic defects increase, so if they had kids they would probably be fine, but if their kids then had kids with each other that would be a problem.

    GtheOtter said:
    Good.... to know.... O_O

    ThisIsAnUniqueName said:
    Agreed, homozygosity intensity gets worse as the same genetics are overlapped over and over.
    A link I found helpful
    (I really don't know what I just said)

    bakeneko said:
    Funny thing about that, I also heard that technically it's possible to have a child with your 3rd or more distant cousin without any risk of genetic defect as the genetic relation at that point is thin enough for that not to be an issue, or something to that effect.

    Genjar said:
    There's always a risk, regardless of the relations. Genetic defects are common in humans. Pair off any two random strangers, and it's likely that some defects will be passed on.

    Having a child with your second cousin is pretty much as risky as having one with some random person from your hometown. Because you almost certainly have too many common ancestors. ...which is why inbreeding tends to be a major problem in small xenophobic communities. Everyone's closely related, even if they don't realize it.

    The amount of chromosomes also comes into this - humans have 46 chromosomes, which increases the chance for defects due limited possible combinations between each of the 23 chromosomes both parents give to the offspring when closely related.
    Horses, as example, have 64 chromosomes. That's why inbreeding only got a problem after a few generations. (Through human influence)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • neo4812 said:
    good job, enjoy that retard baby

    Not even trying to support Incest but this sentence triggered me. Offspring from siblings have no guarantee of birth defects, and have as high a chance as a child from non related parents. First generation incest has the same risks as everyone else.

    Now shut up and enjoy the teenage furry sex.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Know that Oh SHIT moment when the body is milliseconds from blowing the load.

    ... And thrusting deep turns out to be the best way to release it all.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • bakeneko said:
    Funny thing about that, I also heard that technically it's possible to have a child with your 3rd or more distant cousin without any risk of genetic defect as the genetic relation at that point is thin enough for that not to be an issue, or something to that effect.

    YOU'RE JUST A GIFT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • 1Eragon1 said:
    ba dum dum. =Pregnancy intensifies=

    Pregnancy would only be a problem if she was in heat. Assuming we're using that kind of biological logic here...
    Then again, her brother does have a human penis (and she has a somewhat human vagina), so I could be wrong.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0