Somehow her face made my think it was demicoeur's art.

Dreaded-Warrior said:
Somehow her face made my think it was demicoeur's art.

Agreed

Most of the pic itself is absolutely awesome, especially her facial expression and the hand on her right breast, but unfortunately her vagina really turns me off... Gonna check out Kyma's other art, though.

its what normal vagina looks like bro

vertical bacon sandvich

rachel said:
its what normal vagina looks like bro

Yup. That's why vaginas are scary.

Ehh... being the owner of a vagina myself, I'm going to have to say... no. This is... CLOSE to what a vagina looks like.

However, just like a drawing where the character's spine is misaligned, and everything is just a bit out of place.

add in also that the artist made some very unflattering choices... the internal shot, for example, is nice! Except for the fact taht I at least started at it for several minutes trying to figure out where inside and outside were. The end result is that the lips seems like they're glued on oddly to some bulbous black thing with some weird fleshy junk going up the si--OH! IT'S A PENIS! seriously, that's SO close to being hot as hell, but it just.. fails in execution. :)

and the OTHER pussy... her hand being there totally obscures the anatomy. while I believe those are intended to be her inner lips, and who's holding back her outer lips, the effect is more that those ARE her outer lips and that her clit is mysteriously placed on the outside of her pussy. Add in that the shading, while nice, does not really lend itself to depth... and the pussy seems like it's set further forward then it ought to be.

all in all, ti's a nice piece of work, but that's not a vagina. It's close... but it's not.

SnowWolf said:
Vagina rant

-clap-

Why did i notice that the males pubic fur near the internal shot looks like a rose? >>

No-Problem-Bro said:
-clap-

Vagina rant? not really. More like 'art critisism'. Which, hey, is pretty cool. If the artist ever comes here, they have some feedback. that's a good thing.

I'm fucking him!

...and then he's going to fuck me!

...OH MY GAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWD!

Oooooo, I love a well-drawn knotting! <3

nnyallright! Orgasms are cool.

that facial expression is too...toony...needs naughty face!

SnowWolf said:
Ehh... being the owner of a vagina myself, I'm going to have to say... no. This is... CLOSE to what a vagina looks like.

However, just like a drawing where the character's spine is misaligned, and everything is just a bit out of place.

add in also that the artist made some very unflattering choices... the internal shot, for example, is nice! Except for the fact taht I at least started at it for several minutes trying to figure out where inside and outside were. The end result is that the lips seems like they're glued on oddly to some bulbous black thing with some weird fleshy junk going up the si--OH! IT'S A PENIS! seriously, that's SO close to being hot as hell, but it just.. fails in execution. :)

and the OTHER pussy... her hand being there totally obscures the anatomy. while I believe those are intended to be her inner lips, and who's holding back her outer lips, the effect is more that those ARE her outer lips and that her clit is mysteriously placed on the outside of her pussy. Add in that the shading, while nice, does not really lend itself to depth... and the pussy seems like it's set further forward then it ought to be.

all in all, ti's a nice piece of work, but that's not a vagina. It's close... but it's not.

Can't unsee. -.-

Updated Source.

SnowWolf said:
Vagina rant? not really. More like 'art critisism'. Which, hey, is pretty cool. If the artist ever comes here, they have some feedback. that's a good thing.

It goes beyond criticism when you say it "fails" and follow that with a smiley face; that's passive aggression in a nutshell.

If you want to offer constructive criticism, keep the tune of "I think that ..." and ask questions like "Would it be better if you tried ...", so you're less likely to offend, while still offering your opinion and valid solutions to an artistic problem that someone might be struggling with.

Krovakh said:
It goes beyond criticism when you say it "fails" and follow that with a smiley face; that's passive aggression in a nutshell.

Well, that comment was 5 or 6 years old when you replied to it, but I guess I'll offer a response...?

Hello! My name is SnowWolf :) I am--or rather, was--a rather common sight around here once upon a time. I like to think that I had a reputation for being friendly and cheerful, engaged in the community and making efforts to be a generally positive member of the site! I won't say I was a bastion of sunshine and roses, but I'm pretty sure I had a reputation as 'the friendly admin' for a reason, lol. I use/used smiley faces a LOT. To me, they're often used as a marker to say "I smiled while speaking this sentence..." Or in this case, "please don't take my criticism too strongly. I'm offering this in a friendly manner." but not everyone reads it that way and that's okay. We're all different people who understand things in different ways.

In this case... I maintain that it was criticism. Saying something fails is not the same as posting an image meme with the word FAIL printed on it in white impact font. Failure is to not succeed, or to fall short. It is not.. hmm.. it's not a youtube video filled with people who are hurting themselves spectacularly. It's not explosive catastrophe, or injury. It's just.... not succeeding. "Spectacular skateboarding fails!!!' is on one end, while "I failed to get dinner started on time" is on the other.

If you go and read a movie review, particularly a negative one, you'll probably suddenly across a like like the following: "while the characters are vivid and fascinating, the film fails to engage you with the greater plot. In the end, you worry more about the fate of the characters rather than engaged in the battles they face." or "Over all, while a fun explosive romp, the movie fails to deliver any truly interesting characters, with several cliched tropes marching around the screen, chesspieces on a dark chessboard controlled by an unseen villain." ...These movies can still be INTERESTING and EXCITING films despite their shortcomings.

Krovakh said: If you want to offer constructive criticism, keep the tune of "I think that ..." and ask questions like "Would it be better if you tried ...", so you're less likely to offend, while still offering your opinion and valid solutions to an artistic problem that someone might be struggling with.

That said, I appreciate your efforts to guide me to offering better feedback. (I really do! It's kind of you to try to help someone to not come off abrasively and to protect artists!) You are correct in that my post could be seen as overly critical, and doesn't have much/any 'friendly padding' to make Ye Traditional Compliment Sandwich. (though the compliment sandwich is not actually considered to be the best method of feedback anymore, but I digress.) ...

That also said, as an artist, I would probably want to punt someone who clearly HAS ideas about what would make it better, but wrapped it up in an overly passive "would it be better if...?" post, as they clearly HAVE an idea in mind. But we're all different like that. *I* would rather get a straight forward "This part looks strange to me." and explain why. (see also, the 4th paragraph, where I explain what I see, and what I think the artist intended, and why I believe I see it incorrectly.)

I should have been more friendly about the whole thing, though, you're correct!

ANyway, I've used up my word quota for the year... have a nice day :)

This is probably the most accurate internal shot I've seen on the site. Clearly shaped cervix that is impenetrable, with no cum going through it, splashing around and away from it. There needs to be a tag for this sort of thing.

Nice pov