Aliasing reverse_missionary → reverse_missionary_position
Link to alias

Reason:

Maybe "wordy" but would probably be nice to get more consistency with the other "position" tags.

Edit: Apparently I have yet again failed at searching, see also: forum #139514

Based on that thread you linked, it seems like everybody was in agreement on the change. I don't see any obvious issues with approving it, but I'm going to hold off for a day or two just to give everybody a last chance for discussion.

I've made the following changes:

• Alias: reverse_missionary -> reverse_missionary_position (OP approved)
• Implication: reverse_missionary_position -> sex (approved), on_back (approved) - to match usage of missionary_position
• Implication: sandwich_position -> sex (approved)
• Implication: wheelbarrow_position -> sex (approved)
• Implication: deck_chair_position -> sex (approved)
• Implication: lotus_position -> sex (approved)
• Implication: reverse_piledriver_position -> sex (approved)

There are a few pending ones that I want to mention, but as far as I know these should always refer to sex, correct?

parasprite said:

• Implication: deck_chair_position -> sex (pending)

This one is problematic.
I don't know why we started tagging those as deck chair position, because that name usually refers to 'anvil_position'. Here's one example.

It should be renamed, but it's such an unusual position that I can't think of any common name for it. It's pretty close to the spider position, though.

parasprite said:
... There are a few pending ones that I want to mention, but as far as I know these should always refer to sex, correct?

The only problem I see would be if someone tags using lotus_position for the non sexual variant, aka the cross legged sitting position. For example (while not quite a true lotus):
post #379068

Or if there is a wheelbarrow race and someone would tag it as such, though probably a long shot... I guess any of those positions can be attempted fully clothed without any sex going on at all... Not that the tags are supposed to be used that way...

Genjar said:
This one is problematic.
I don't know why we started tagging those as deck chair position, because that name usually refers to 'anvil_position'. Here's one example.

It should be renamed, but it's such an unusual position that I can't think of any common name for it. It's pretty close to the spider position, though.

Not to be confused with actual spider sex.

My guess because it's a fold chair and you can often fold it down... Anyway... There's also the "crab" position but it seems to vary in execution.

Oh and thanks for a fascinating read.

deck_chair_position is now approved. If we can think of a better place to put them I'd be fine with that, but for now this implication will be a valid one.