Implicating bastet_(p&d) → puzzle_&_dragons
Link to implication

Reason:

Character from the game.

echidna_(p&d) and some others from here should be implied, but some of them are not even furry so maybe it's not necessary to make implication.

There's also tag puzzle_and_dragons_z which probably should be aliased/implicated to p&d, but also "and" should be changed to "&" to be consistent.

Approved. I also approved all of the characters I found, as well as move some tagged *_(puzzle_and/&_dragons) to be consistent with the rest, and implicated them to the main tag.

I don't know much about the series, but from what I've gathered I'm leaning towards an alias. Anybody want to weigh in on this?

There are many characters specific to Puzzle and Dragons Z that are not in the main game, and many in the main game that are not in Puzzle and Dragons Z, though there is some overlap. That said, I think an alias is probably reasonable. It seems to me similar to various versions of the Pokemon games - we don't have, for instance, a "Generation IV" tag.