Aliasing no_yiff -> rating:s.

Reason:

Doesn't gore and whatnot constitute an explicit rating as well?

No_yiff shouldn't even be a tag.

drearyrains said:
Doesn't gore and whatnot constitute an explicit rating as well?

I'm pretty sure that explicit is only for sexual content, and gore only gets questionable.

ippiki_ookami said:
No_yiff shouldn't even be a tag.

Total agreement that no_yiff shouldn't even be a tag. A lack of yiffy subject material is implied by a lack of yiffy tags like sex, masturbation, anal, cunnilingus, etc.

It was only used on 3 images, and I removed it from them.

Also: no_yiff wouldn't imply rating:s anyways. Full-body nude images are not rating:s, but don't need to feature yiff-like actions. Examples abound if you search nude -sex.

I personally feel that guro should get an explicit rating, but if we want to leave explicit for sex, that's fine by me since I blacklist guro anyways. I would note, however, the help: ratings page reads "Safe posts are images that you would not feel guilty looking at openly in public", which I believe means the search guro rating:s should return no results. Looks like I have an opportunity to make 48 good edits.

I vote for no_yiff -> invalid_tag
Oh wait, already removed.