Implicating green_eyes -> eyes.
Reason: Can't have green eyes if you have no eyes.
Updated by null0010
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating green_eyes -> eyes.
Reason: Can't have green eyes if you have no eyes.
Updated by null0010
Unnecessarily specific, don't you think?
Updated by anonymous
we shouldn't even have an eyes tag if you ask me
Updated by anonymous
scruffysecond.jpg
Binary qualifiers don't need two tags. (I'm not even sure if that statement makes sense)
If an image doesn't have the eyeless tag, it by definition must have eyes.
Updated by anonymous
The eyes tag exists, and we tolerate it, but we're not gonna do anything to facilitate its growth.
Updated by anonymous
i don't like eyes
Updated by anonymous