Implicating muscular_female -> female.

Reason: People seem to have a penchant for tagging "muscular_female" but not "female", and retagging them is annoying. I can't think of an instance where you could use the former but not the latter.

Snowmew said:
Implicating muscular_female -> female.

Reason: People seem to have a penchant for tagging "muscular_female" but not "female", and retagging them is annoying. I can't think of an instance where you could use the former but not the latter.

There's, like... nine images with muscular_female -female.

It's how hard to fix?

GreyMaria said:
There's, like... nine images with muscular_female -female.

It's how hard to fix?

It's how hard to add implications?

TraumaFox said:
It's how hard to add implications?

We shouldn't have to make implications every time someone makes up a new tag that's only been used 9 times, and may not be ever used again. My personal inclination is to remove the tag from all 9 images, as the majority have all been added by one person who likely didn't notice that it's not an established tag. We've got muscular and female; I don't think we need muscular_female.

Sounds good; it seems like there are exactly 0 muscular_male tags though, what's up with that?

An alias would be better.

titaniachkt said:
Sounds good; it seems like there are exactly 0 muscular_male tags though, what's up with that?

Because we're furries, and furries have a penchant for the unusual. And there's nothing unusual about a muscular male.