Implicating pubic_hair → body_hair
Link to implication

Reason:

Pubic hair is body hair.

Didn't know we had a body_hair tag

pubic_hair was aliased to pubes but I guess that makes sense. body_hair is hardly used but seems perfectly valid.

I don't generally think of pubic hair as body hair.

Well it is hair on the body, but I see what you mean, I tend to think of body has as hair that is everywhere else on the main torso and limbs

In agreement with Rainbow. Also, why is it aliased to pubes instead of the reverse? fur is still hair, and pubic *feathers* are unique enough they should be tagged separately.

123easy said:
In agreement with Rainbow. Also, why is it aliased to pubes instead of the reverse? fur is still hair, and pubic *feathers* are unique enough they should be tagged separately.

SnowWolf and I had a very long discussion about it, and the reasoning was so that it can be tagged as an umbrella tag for all kinds of pubes, but I think I'd prefer the reverse

Rainbow_Dash said:
SnowWolf and I had a very long discussion about it, and the reasoning was so that it can be tagged as an umbrella tag for all kinds of pubes, but I think I'd prefer the reverse

Ah, I see. That makes sense, but I still prefer the reverse. Seems like something to open a separate discussion about, perhaps?

123easy said:
Ah, I see. That makes sense, but I still prefer the reverse. Seems like something to open a separate discussion about, perhaps?

Naw, let's just discuss it here as it's outcome will determine the outcome of this implication as well