Implicating cowgirl_position → on_top
Link to implication

Reason:

As long as it's properly tagged, there must be someone on top in cowgirl position.

How is on_top a tag at all?
Unless the sex is happening with both partners standing parallel to each other, and perpendicular to the ground, someone's going to be on top.

Tag is way too broad.

Halite said:
How is on_top a tag at all?
Unless the sex is happening with both partners standing parallel to each other, and perpendicular to the ground, someone's going to be on top.

Tag is way too broad.

What is on_top?
That is a really vague term...an apple could be on_top of a bookshelf as much as a chick on_top of a dick.

Moon_Moon said:
What is on_top?
That is a really vague term...an apple could be on_top of a bookshelf as much as a chick on_top of a dick.

So, you agree it's too broad then?

Let's make a definition for on_top, and where to use it then

Rainbow_Dash said:
Let's make a definition for on_top, and where to use it then

Can we just not use it?
Seems to be a less than useful tag.

we could do that too

Rainbow_Dash said:
Let's make a definition for on_top, and where to use it then

Already defined in the Wiki: "This tag is for any depiction of a character positioned on top of another character".

And it exists because there's no other tag for those postures. It's basically in the same tag group as on_back, standing, bent_over, sitting, etc.

Those are probably not too useful for generic searches, but are handy for finding mistagged images and missing tags.

Genjar said:
Already defined in the Wiki: "This tag is for any depiction of a character positioned on top of another character".

And it exists because there's no other tag for those postures. It's basically in the same tag group as on_back, standing, bent_over, sitting, etc.

Those are probably not too useful for generic searches, but are handy for finding mistagged images and missing tags.

Ah, you make a good point. For the tag, then.

Genjar said:
Already defined in the Wiki: "This tag is for any depiction of a character positioned on top of another character".

And it exists because there's no other tag for those postures. It's basically in the same tag group as on_back, standing, bent_over, sitting, etc.

Those are probably not too useful for generic searches, but are handy for finding mistagged images and missing tags.

Problem is, that's so incredibly generic that probably 90% of images depicting sex would get the tag.