Aliasing tight → invalid_tag
Link to alias

Reason:

Too ambiguous.
Before I cleaned it, there were 100+ images with nearly 50/50 split between tight_fit and tight_clothing. So it can't be aliased to either of those.

Also, there were a few cases where I was unsure why they're tagged as tight. Such as these:
post #34230 post #173976 post #330720

Genjar said:
Aliasing tight → invalid_tag
Link to alias

Reason:

Too ambiguous.
Before I cleaned it, there were 100+ images with nearly 50/50 split between tight_fit and tight_clothing. So it can't be aliased to either of those.

Also, there were a few cases where I was unsure why they're tagged as tight. Such as these:
post #34230 post #173976 post #330720

First is tight_fit since she's grimacing at him entering her. indicative of pain from being too tight for his size. Second... don't see why. Third, a) bronies, b) she's "tight", as per tight_fit.

I agree with you on alias though.

I might alias it to tight fit as that seems to be the best intention of a regular person adding it

Rainbow_Dash said:
I might alias it to tight fit as that seems to be the best intention of a regular person adding it

Then we'd have to clean it constantly. Tight_fit didn't apply to even half of what was tagged with it. There were a lot of skimpy clothing and tight_clothing, mostly solo poses.

Genjar said:
Then we'd have to clean it constantly. Tight_fit didn't apply to even half of what was tagged with it. There were a lot of skimpy clothing and tight_clothing, mostly solo poses.

Perhaps I'll nuke it them? Any last pleas for mercy from the city known as "tight"?

Personally, I don't see any reason for keeping it around. Maybe nuking is the best choice. As long as it's from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

Nuked from orbit, it was the only way to be sure